Wednesday, 01 February 2017 17:00

Is It Time to Short America?, Part 2: Crony Capitalism Leads to Socioeconomic Stratification - the Rich Get Richer! Featured

Continuing the conversation of whether it's time to short America, we investigate the administration's plans for protectionism and a tax holiday for corporate capital repatriation. The first question that needs to be asked is, "Who benefits from this, and why do they want it done?"

thumb Trump economic netowrk

 For the outline that we are working from, reference Is Time to Short America? Macro Risks + Unpredictable Administration / Geopolitical Uncertainty = ?. Two of the Trump administration's biggest selling points are protectionism and tax holidays. 


Trump has already authorized the building of an $18B dollar wall. This is a monumental undertaking which he already speculated would enrich certain manufacturing companies, reference Some of the Biggest Beneficiaries From Building a Mexican Border Wall May Be Mexican Materials Companies. As a matter of fact, some companies' share prices have already started moving in anticipation (chomping at the bit, so to say) or getting a chunk of that deal, look!

1200x 1

Do you know why number 6 on that list is moving so much? Take a guess! It's because the swimming among the many standing conflicts of interest in the Trump administration... (click any graphic to expand so you can see those little words)

thumb Trump economic netowrk

Is his pick for Secretary of Transportation, Elaine Chao. Ms. Chao just so happens to be director on the board of Vulcan Materials. Helluva coincidence, eh?

Elaine Chow economic netowrk

I'll give you three guesses, and a bonus round if you still can't catch up, as to who will get a good portion of the $18B wall building businesses when it comes up to bid (or sole source, as it may be).

Trump also floated the idea of a tax holiday to repatriate foreign capital into the US to fill our coffers and provide capital for hew jobs and hiring. It sounds very good, except for two things:

  1. It doesn't work like that,and 
  2. it exacerbates the problem by making the rich people richer and the poor people poorer.

Now, rich people may like that concept - at least at first, and if they didn't think it through. Of course, once you start thinking, you realize the world (nor this country) can live solely off of financial assets. Somebody, somewhere has to work to build or make something of tangible value. Herein lies the rub. You have to enable workers to maintain a better then living wage, or the amount of time the capitalist class can take advantage of them is limited. Let's step through some historical facts and analysis, shall we? (Download the full document here)

 tax holiday1

tax holiday2

So, if tax holidays don't work, and they have been proven not to work in the past, why in the world would Trump, et. al. recommend a tax holiday? The answer is quite simple - follow the money! These are the companies that have the highest holdings offshore, and the best tax/bailout deals with the government. I don't have time to get into the finance dudes, but the tech side drives the message home.

thumb tech offshores1100

Now, does this answer the question as to why Trump will declare a tax holiday if it actually loses money for the American people and costs jobs? Of course it does, just look at the Secretary of Commerce nominee. He's the multi-billionaire, Wilbur Ross. Wilbur is a very, very connected man. Among those connections, he ran the Rothschild's financial arm as Chairman, CIO and Executive Managing Director.

The Rothschild's are one of the oldest money families in the western world, dating back to the 1760s. They control a lot! Now they control the US Presidency through Secretary of Commerce (the Democratic Party cannot block it).

Wilbur Ross Economic Network

What else does he control? Well, he's also Chairman and Chief Strategy Office of Invesco, Ltd. To put this into perspective, Invesco has over $2,000,000,000 of holdings of the yellow highlighted companies in just ONE (1) fund. There are at least 3 to 4 other funds that hold these stocks too. There's no conflict there, is it?

thumb Invesco tech hodlings

Now, to be fair, Mr. Ross has said he would divest of assets that pose a conflict, as I'm sure Ms. Chao has promised as well. Then again... That's what Donald said, wasn't it? Even if he does fully (operative word) divest his linkages and ability to bestow favoritism is not only extant, but strong and deep. Expect Goldman and Rothschilds to take issue in their divvying of the booty. I can go into Trump's wooing of the auto industry, and Mr. Ross's extensive auto industry businesses and connections, but I think you get the point. 

So, now you know why we can have a tax holiday and and build a wall, when neither is in the country's best interest. For those investors who have running less than $16B or so in AUM, there is actually a need for sustained economic activity uptick, and not the temporary trading spike to be had from these one time machinations. That, I'm afraid, will not happen if these policy proposals actually go through.

Tax holiday for corporate capital repatriation borne on faulty premise, one that history clearly illustrates:

  1. The last tax holiday that we've had was in 2004, allowing U.S. multinational companies, allowing them to repatriate foreign profits at a 5.25% tax rate. Consequently, corporations repatriated $362 billion into the American economy. That is $456 billion in 2017. These funds were used primarily for paying dividends to investors, repurchasing shares, and M&A activity - basically, the acquisition of financial assets. In 2011, Senate Democrats, arguing against another repatriation tax holiday, issued a report asserting that the previous effort had actually cost the United States Treasury $3.3 billion, and that companies receiving the tax breaks had thereafter cut over 20,000 jobs.[2] A second repatriation tax holiday was defeated in the United States Senate in 2009.

We are wavering between moderately and strongly bearish in the medium term. We do acknowledge some trading spikes, hence we are researching long/short trades to minimize some of the risk. 

My next article will discuss the possibility of stagflation with plenty of data for paying subscribers. 

See also, Is the Trump Rally Over?

Last modified on Thursday, 02 February 2017 02:52 | This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.