intel-haswell
The Intel Haswell processor has killed Microsoft's Windows RT before it even grew legs. The only reason to ever opt for a device that runs a slimmed down OS such as Windows RT was the moribund decision between higher performance/larger form factor or longer battery life/smaller form factor. Well, Intel's Haswell chips promise (and deliver, I'm typing on a 2 pound, .68 inch carbon fiber, touch screen notebook right now) to offer full blown i5 and i7 desktop performance in tablets and ultrabooks for 7 to 10 hours at a clip. That promise has been kept. Say goodbye to Windows RT and its ARM architecture. It may have been good to know you, but we will never really find out, will we?

Now, I know the more swift among you are problably saying, "Hey, wait a minute!!!" "If Haswell kills off the ARM powered RT devices, what about all of the other popular ARM devices?

Three years ago, I warned everybodey - Remember, the iPad and Android tablets run on on ARM. As a matter of fact, imagine having an i5 Haswell on a 6 inch smartphone that runs FULL BLOWN windows on a HD+ screen that lasts 9-15 hours on a charge.

I'm writing this on an i5 Haswell Sony Vaio that is lighter, and also as thin, as an iPad. It has my full quite of apps along with a very usable touch screen. To be frank, the iPad now seems like a collosal waster of money.
Of course, the discussion doesn't stop there. Just as Intel was forced to step up its game due to natural market pressures, other companies had to do so as well - only some companies are the aggressive and their market pressures stem from the need to usurp new markets rather than defend old cash cows. Enter, Qualcomm and their new Snapdragon 800 chipset clocked over 2.2 Ghz. This chip finally brings the abilities of desktop computing to a handheld, and does so with promises of 12-15 hour battery lives. Sound familiar? Damn skippy!
It's a fight ladies and gentleman. Which would you choose, a desktop light and long lasting enough to act like a tablet, or a tablet strong and powerful enough to act like a desktop? What do you think happens when Android 5.0 Keylime Pie is loaded on a tablet running a 3.0 Ghz Haswell i7? Yeah, I had the same reaction.

Subscribers, download the Q3 2013 valuation reports (click here to subscribe).

The update from two months ago is also of value for those who haven't read it. It turns out that it was quite prescienct!

See also:

What Sell Side Wall Street Doesn't Understand About Apple - It's Not The Leader Of The Post PC World!!!

 The short call - October 2012, the month of Apple's all-time high and my call to subscribers to short the stock:  Deconstructing The Most Accurate Apple Analysis Ever Made - Share Price, Market Share, Strategy and All

See also:

Microsoft Finally Bought Nokia As I Susp…

Microsoft Finally Bought Nokia As I Suspected, Now Will They Do The Right Thing?

On Tuesday, 15 February 2011 I penned The Nokia/Microsoft Alliance & Android's Commoditization Of The Mobile Computing Platform... In said missive, I apparently foretold the future, to wit: The Nokia/Microsoft Marriage via Force of Android team up is definitely a plus for Nokia despite the appearance that Microsoft ex-management is moving heavily into company. Nokia probably makes some of the best hardware around, but...

Google's Rumored To Bid For NFL Sunday T…

Google's Rumored To Bid For NFL Sunday Ticket Package, Extant Biz Models Beware!

All Things Digital ran a story today concerning Google bidding for the NFL Sunday Ticket package. CNBC hosts discussed the topic as well. James Cramer asserts that Google may charge for the NFL content if it is successfully acquired. My first thought when hearing this was... Not so fast. The AllthingsD article put it interestingly: Here’s a fun combination to ponder: The...

Have We Reached "Peak Premium Smartphone…

Have We Reached

Quartz.com has an interesting set of articles on the topic of the peaking of the smartphone market. Let's start with thier commentary on Samsung, "Yes, Samsung is acutely aware that we’ve reached “peak trophy smartphone” - as excerpted: South Korean electronics giant Samsung reported soaring profits on Friday, but despite the company’s attempts to manage expectations, the results undershot estimates and its stock dropped almost...

iPad Shipments Decline As BoomBustBlog T…

iPad Shipments Decline As BoomBustBlog Time Machine Disrupts The Apple Reality Distortion Field Once Again

Let's keep this short and simple. Up to two years ago, I claimed that Apple's tablet market share will be subsumed by that of Android's, and it's margins will follow suit. If one were to Google this topic, this would be the result: Apple's iPad Is Losing Market Share And Profit ...  Mar 16, 2012 - Apple's iPad Is Losing Market Share And Profit Margin As Apple Hits All...   Call The End Of The Fat Margin...

Read more

Was The Google Purchase of Motorola A Ha…

Was The Google Purchase of Motorola A Hardware Disaster With Overpriced Patents?

I have yet to release my review of Google's most recent quarter earnings results, but thus far I've seen nothing that would materially sway me from the conclusions drawn from the last set of forensic valuations released to subscribers (Google Q2 2013 Update: Valuing Possibly The Most Powerful Co. In The World?). One question that I am getting is "Did...

Published in BoomBustBlog

On Tuesday, 15 February 2011 I penned The Nokia/Microsoft Alliance & Android's Commoditization Of The Mobile Computing Platform... In said missive, I apparently foretold the future, to wit:

The Nokia/Microsoft Marriage via Force of Android team up is definitely a plus for Nokia despite the appearance that Microsoft ex-management is moving heavily into company. Nokia probably makes some of the best hardware around, but there OS game has been lacking for some time. The only real unaddressed issue is that Elop never addressed the real reason why he didn't adopt Android, and the MSFT alliance doesn't address it either. Reference this quote from Endgadget:

Nokia did talk with Google about adopting Android but decided that it "would have difficulty differentiating within that ecosystem" and the "commoditization risk was very high -- prices, profits, everything being pushed down, value being moved out to Google which was concerning to us." Microsoft presented the best option for Nokia to resume the fight in the high end smarpthone segment."
 
Elop goes further, recognizing what I have been saying for about a year now, and that isGoogle/Android is at the forefront of the mobile computing wars - Nokia: 'Our first priority is beating Android. Again, I query, how is Elop going to do that if he is afraid to commoditize the platform though. Android is commoditizing the whole smartphone space, not just the low end.

If anything, the pressure on the high end is heavier. Look at the Evo and Samsung Galaxy series phones and how they are so much more capable than the iPhone for the same price. Then you have the next gen of phones available next month, ex. the Atrix and LG 1080p, 3D, dual core and quad core phones. If you haven't seen this tech, I strongly suggest you read , it's impressive. This tech is moving lightning fast and the price points aren't budging, although the margins are collapsing in this fast moving space.

As you can see, it was easy to see HTC margins collapsing 3 years ago while it was actually in its heyday. HTC is not the only one either. Samsung and Apple are suffering the same fate, simply reference Have We Reached "Peak Premium Smartphone"?

How is Elop going to address this by using Windows OS? He has to do more than just charge more, he has to produce better product at competitive prices, which keep getting lower. Elop will have to license the Widows OS, which is an expense, one that he would bear to nearly the same extent if he used Android. I feel he mistakenly looks at this as Google commoditizing the Android platform, in lieu of the more reasonable perspective of Google commoditizing the entire portable computer space. They can do this because they benefit regardless, as long as the masses are moved to the cloud. See

    1. Android Now Outselling iOS? Explaining the Game of Chess That Google Plays in the Smart Phone Space

Long story short, the only company that is positioned to come out on top of this hardware battle is Google, at least thus far. But that begs the question, what if one of the other big boys catches on? On Thursday, 25 October 2012 I penned Microsoft Is Doing What The "Has Been Giants Of Yesteryear" Were Afraid To Do, Make A Radical Change BEFORE ITS TOO LATE!, to wit:

Roughly 3 years ago in my "mobile computing wars" series, I foretold of The Creatively Destructive Pace of Technology Innovation and the Paradigm Shift known as the Mobile Computing Wars! In particular, I warned of the benefits to the consumer and pitfalls to the potential losers of the battle between Apple, Microsoft and Google, reference There Is Another Paradigm Shift Coming in Technology and Media: Apple, Microsoft and Google Know its Winner Takes All. By the way, by Q1 2010, it was already evident to BoomBustBloggers that Research In Motion was a goner - ). While the bulk of my opinion and analysis was directed between the upcoming heated battle between Apple and Google (The Mobile Computing and Content Wars: Part 2, the Google Response to the Paradigm Shift and An Introduction to How Apple Apple Will Compete With the Google/Android Onslaught) which was accurately called, I also appeared to be the lone gunman in warning that Microsoft is not even close to being out of the race just yet - . This was early 2010. Well, nearly 3 years later, we have MSFT doing what IBM, LOTUS, HP, DELL, and a wide variety of other tech companies simply didn't have the balls to do. What is that, you ask? They risked cannibalizing their cash cow revenues and kicking their lazy, unmotivated (despite declining margins and market share, via ass whoopin's from Google and Apple) OEM's in the nuts, forcing either an exponential growth via a pheonix-like rebirth style wake-up call or a collapse from atrophy.

You see, although Microsoft doesn't get much mobile respect these days (and for good reason), their Windows mobile platform is quite capable. After securing the full purchase of Nokia's handset business and licensing of its patents, MSFT is actually well positioned to do some damage in the space if it truly has the balls to do what it takes. Before I go on, let's take a look at the weapon of choice that I would use...

Review: Stellar camera makes Nokia Lumia 1020 first Windows phone worth loving 

In less than a month, the Lumia 1020 has become this reviewer’s go-to smartphone for taking shots of everything from family to friends to practices.

It's the 41-pixel camera that makes the Lumia 1020 competitive as a point-and-shoot and phone all rolled into one.

NOKIA

It's the 41-pixel camera that makes the Lumia 1020 competitive as a point-and-shoot and phone all rolled into one.

The best camera is always the one you have with you. And these days, the camera you have with you can be one of the best cameras you've ever used, too.

That's the key selling point for the Nokia Lumia 1020, the first Windows phone that's actually worth loving. It runs on the same Windows Mobile OS that Microsoft has been pushing for the last few years — the sometimes clever, sometimes annoying software that is still searching for its place in an Apple-vs.-Android world.

But never mind that.

It's the hardware that makes the Lumia 1020 competitive. To be more specific, it's the camera, all 41 megapixels of it. It's a potent point-and-shoot and a decent phone all rolled into one, and in this era of Twitpic, that's something that draws attention.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/review-nokia-lumia-1020-stellar-camera-article-1.1444253#ixzz2dx1jI7ux

So, what happens if you take that hardware, it's competent but not necessarily Android-dominating OS, and embue it with the two things that 90% of smart phone consumers use and want, but don't have available on their smartphones? What is that, you ask? Well, I'm talking about fully capable Microsoft Office and X-Box gaming! Integrate full, usable, uncrippled Office suite and the full port of XBox gaming and media on this Nokia handset with just a tad larger screen with no premium in pricing and you start attracting power users such as myself to the table. When people like me sit down and eat, we often bring our family, friends, readers, followers and clients. That's how Android did it!

The caveat is... In order for Microsoft to accomplish this they will have to eat margin compression in the short to medium term - and big time. Of course, anyone paying attention knows MSFT will eat this dish best served cold anyway, it's just a matter of who serves it to them. Either they do it themselves and leave room for expanded revenues to compensate, or they let Google's Android force feed them at the compression table. The decision is theirs, I suggest they choose wisely...

Subscribers, see also... 

 

Published in BoomBustBlog

Quartz.com has an interesting set of articles on the topic of the peaking of the smartphone market. Let's start with thier commentary on Samsung, "Yes, Samsung is acutely aware that we’ve reached “peak trophy smartphone” - as excerpted:

South Korean electronics giant Samsung reported soaring profits on Friday, but despite the company’s attempts to manage expectations, the results undershot estimates and its stock dropped almost 1%. That’s on top of a 13% slump in June that wiped $26 billion off Samsung’s value—a bigger loss than Sony’s entire market capitalization.

This may seem odd, given that its flagship smartphone, the Galaxy S4, has flown off the shelf, supported by a super-sized marketing campaign. The problem is that amid steep competition, there aren’t many customers left who can afford flashy trophy phones and don’t already have one.

As a result, Samsung’s management is beginning to pivot away from its current reliance on the Galaxy series—it announced a $1 billion increase in investmentexpected to go to other businesses on Friday—even if it is still keen to tap into some developing markets still hungry for shiny high-end telephonic gadgets. It already leads the world in televisions, chips and displays, and recently launched a high-end OLED television. Its memory chip business announced a 71% increase in operating profit from last year, and it has a powerful reputation in many emerging markets.

Of course, BoomBustBloggers were on this at least a year and a half ahead of time, referencing Samsung Will Be Ready To Do That Fruit Thing ... and Computer Hardware Vendors Are Dead, Part Deux! As excerpted:

I warned in plenty of time to both avoid loss and profit on the short side for each company:
rotten blackberriesrotten blackberries

Research in Motion in early 2010: 

Rotten plus GreenAppleRotten plus GreenApple

Apple from 2010 till the ultimate short call in October just past: Deconstructing The Most Accurate Apple Analysis Ever Made - Share Price, Market Share, Strategy and All

andriod-vs-appleandriod-vs-apple

I also laid clear the path to Google's prominence as far back as 2010, when there was not a peep from the sell side, see Google's Q4, 2012: This Looks To Be The Leader Of The New Distributed Information Paradigm .

Now, Samsung seems to be the most innovative of the handset vendors to date, but if I'm right, they will end up having to innovate in a commodity space just like the traditional PC manufacturers (Dell, HP, etc.) have to do now. Why?  Because of point number Three...

The new PC is not even a PC anymore, its a multi-tiered, multi-function, distributed cluster of interactive, location aware, multimedia applications sharing your social activities and data through a network of servers - in short, it's the cloud!

For right now, GOOGLE IS THE CLOUD! See my video descriptions of Google's business models above.

 Quartz then went on to write "Tim Cook is right. Smartphones haven’t peaked", as excerpted:

Tim Cook on peak smartphone: "I don't believe that."

There’s been plenty of concern lately that the market Apple arguably created—high-end smartphones—is approaching the saturation point. Quartz has written a ton on the dynamic, whether it be the ongoing importance of lower-priced feature phones for social media or the recently leaked photos of what’s rumored to be a new “cheap” iPhone.

Goldman Sachs’ chief Apple watcher Bill Shope raised the issue with the man himself, Apple CEO Tim Cook, in the company’s after-earnings conference call yesterday. Here’s the exchange. (Highlights ours.)

Shope: Despite the fairly substantial iPhone upside this quarter, there’s been increasing concerns that the high end of the smartphone market is reaching saturation point and that growth may be harder to come by for really for all vendors. What’s your perspective on that and the current industry dynamics? And Tim, do you think there are new innovations and services in the pipeline that can reinvigorate the premium segment of the market, after what’s obviously been a bit of a tough 2013 for that segment for the industry?

Cook: From a growth point of view for Apple, our key catalyst will always will be new products and new services. And these are both in existing categories that we’re in and in new categories. In addition to this, we have opportunities in distribution from carrier relationships to expanding our retail stores, expanding our online store and continuing to expand the indirect channel. And we also have a market expansion opportunity.

Peter (Oppenheimer, Apple’s CFO) mentioned enterprise in his comments and the share positions that we have there, over 60% in both iPad and iPhone and I think we’re at the very front-end of that, and so I think we have lots of growth opportunities. And I don’t subscribe to the common view that the higher-end, if you will, the smartphone market has hit its peak. I don’t believe that, but we’ll see and we’ll report our results as we go along.

For the record, some argue that there could still plenty of iPhone growth to be had in the US. Wonky analyst Horace Dediu notes that the latest ComScore survey data shows some 98 million Americans older than 13 (that’s nearly a third of the country) don’t use smartphones as their primary phone. And he argues in this recent post that even with 60% smartphone penetration in the US, “the rate of adoption of smartphones is not slowing in any perceptible way.”

Obviously, I beg to differ. First of all, the rate of adoption and overall growth rate is slowing. This is natural and to be expected, though - particularly since the market is still experiencing healthy growth. It is by far not the biggest issue at hand, and I feel the article is missing the bigger picture. Even if the high end smartphone market is still matching its historical growth projectory (which it is not), the margins on said growth are shrinking, and shrinking rapidly. Apple's financial dominance, it's share price and much of its cache are predicated on being able to sell pretty widgets at 50%-70% margins. Google's extreme success with Android, it's negative margin business modeland the natural law of economics and business market maturation guarantee those margins are a thing of the past as I've promised in years past - Right On Time, My Prediction Of Apple Margin Compression.

Steve Cook preaches innovation, but Apple is being out-innovated at a ridiculously rapid clip. Not only are the Andriod phones and tablets producing hardware/software configurations that are making the iPhone (and to a lesser extent, the iPad) look historical and dated, but Google is at the forefront of the next generation form factor for the new "smartphone". 

In addition, Apple is losing market share in a market whose growth is slowing. I warned about this two years ago. There is a positive correlation between margins and market share, and chances are when you start losing much of the latter, the other will follow suit.

As excerpted from "Is Tim Cook Cooked? Market Share vs Profit Margin, part 2 - Follow What I Do, Not What I Say!" 

... the financial metrics, over time and in handset companies, heavily favor market share over initial profit margin. As a matter of fact, I demonstrated that as market share decreases margins drop commensurately, or in other words "Quantity is quality in a fast moving, technologically dynamic market!"

In early 2010 I warned on Blackberry (then RIMM), with market share loss to Android being the prime determinant... . I put significant data out in the public domain to illustrate my point and put explicit price points out for subscribers, ie. RIM Smart Phone Market Share, RIP? Was I right?

Blackberry market share vs margin correlation analysis

The has been the case with IBM, Nokia, Dell, HTC, Apple, Blackberry, etc. Mr. Cook, take the advice of Mr. Jobs if you don't wish to follow Mr. Middleton. I actually do believe that Cook understands these dynamics and is just putting on a dog and pony show for the media but his corporate actions don't bear this out. I strongly suggest they start spending that $174B cash horde on something other than massaging hedge funds.

So, does Mr. Cook's lack of adherence to Steve Jobs wisdom portend a potentially uber-successful company misunderstood by the markets (meaning time to buy stock) or is this the beginning of the end of an iconic corporate era?

 See also I See A Game Changer Through Google Glass. You see, the smart phone market is naturally morphing into the contextual computing market, but some of the big boys simply don't know it yet. We might as well stop calling them phones.

I refer my subscribers to the research documents below for the answers... 

Subscribers, download the Q3 2013 valuation reports (click here to subscribe).

The update from two months ago is also of value for those who haven't read it. It turns out that it was quite prescienct!

See also:

What Sell Side Wall Street Doesn't Understand About Apple - It's Not The Leader Of The Post PC World!!!

 The short call - October 2012, the month of Apple's all-time high and my call to subscribers to short the stock:  Deconstructing The Most Accurate Apple Analysis Ever Made - Share Price, Market Share, Strategy and All

Subscribers, see also... 

 
Published in BoomBustBlog

As I said in 2010, 2011, 2012 and this year, the less than free Android business model is killin 'em - Apple in particular. On Friday, 02 September 2011 I posted Google's Android Now Leads In Market Share, Growth Rate and Potential Buyer Preference. I made it clear that Apple's slowing of Google's growth was paramount to their continued success. I take it they didn't get that memo. Earlier this year I posted "Is Tim Cook Cooked? Market Share vs Profit Margin, part 2 - Follow What I Do, Not What I Say!" and it went something like this:

Tim Cook was in the media yesterday weighing in on market share. It's as if he is in a delirium, that is if you believe his words, which I don't. He states that for Apple, quality is more important than quantity (or something of that sort). As per Endgadget:

Apple's head honcho Tim Cook is chatting up Android's growth explosion, and it turns out he's not flustered. "Do I look at that? Of course, I don't have my head stuck in the sand," said Cook." But for us, winning has never been about having the most." Instead, he stands by the old Apple line of quality versus quantity. "Arguably, we make the best PC, but we don't make the most," he added. "We made the best music player, and we wound up making the most -- but we didn't initially."

Mr. Cook is ignoring his own ex-boss's words. For those who didn't read my piece yesterday, "Blackberries, Apples & Fruit Borne Successitis - The Problem With Excess Profits Is Hubristic Management Tends To Take Eyes Off The Prize!!!", I quote:

What ruined Apple was not growth … They got very greedy … Instead of following the original trajectory of the original vision, which was to make the thing an appliance and get this out there to as many people as possible … they went for profits. They made outlandish profits for about four years. What this cost them was their future. What they should have been doing is making rational profits and going for market share.

You see, my post yesterday clearly showed that the financial metrics, over time and in handset companies, heavily favor market share over initial profit margin. As a matter of fact, I demonstrated that as market share decreases margins drop commensurately, or in other words "Quantity is quality in a fast moving, technologically dynamic market!"

In early 2010 I warned on Blackberry (then RIMM), with market share loss to Android being the prime determinant... . I put significant data out in the public domain to illustrate my point and put explicit price points out for subscribers, ie. RIM Smart Phone Market Share, RIP? Was I right?

Blackberry market share vs margin correlation analysisBlackberry market share vs margin correlation analysis

The has been the case with IBM, Nokia, Dell, HTC, Apple, Blackberry, etc. Mr. Cook, take the advice of Mr. Jobs if you don't wish to follow Mr. Middleton. I actually do believe that Cook understands these dynamics and is just putting on a dog and pony show for the media but his corporate actions don't bear this out. I strongly suggest they start spending that $174B cash horde on something other than massaging hedge funds.

Fastforward to today and reference this IDC press release:

FRAMINGHAM, Mass. August 7, 2013 – Despite beating Wall Street expectations in terms of shipment volumes, Apple's share in the worldwide smartphone operating system market posted a year-over-year decline during the second quarter of 2013 (2Q13). Meanwhile, Android and Windows Phone both managed slight increases during the same period. According to the International Data Corporation (IDCWorldwide Quarterly Mobile Phone Tracker, vendors shipped a total of 236.4 million smartphones in 2Q13, up 51.3% from the 156.2 million units shipped in 2Q12. Second quarter shipments grew 9.3% when compared to the 216.3 million units shipped in 1Q13.

"The iOS decline in the second quarter aligns with the cyclicality of iPhone," says Ramon Llamas, Research Manager with IDC's Mobile Phone team. "Without a new product launch since the debut of the iPhone 5 nearly a year ago, Apple’s market share was vulnerable to product launches from the competition. But with a new iPhone and revamped iOS coming out later this year, Apple is well-positioned to re-capture market share."

"Last quarter we witnessed Windows Phone shipments surpassing BlackBerry and the trend has continued into the second quarter," said Ryan Reith, Program Manager with IDC's Mobility Tracker Programs. "Nokia has clearly been the driving force behind the Windows Phone platform and we expect that to continue. However, as more and more vendors enter the smartphone market using the Android platform, we expect Windows Phone to become a more attractive differentiator in this very competitive market segment."

Smartphone Operating System Highlights

Android maintained its leadership position, with strong contributions from Samsung and its Galaxy S4. Not to be overlooked were LG and Chinese vendors Huawei, Lenovo, and ZTE, which each recorded double-digit shipment volumes in the millions. Combined, these vendors accounted for 62.5% of all Android-powered smartphone shipments during the quarter. Still, the remaining vendors within the Android ecosystem should not be overlooked, as many have developed a strong local presence within key developing markets.

...and this was exactly as predicted in Samsung Will Be Ready To Do That Fruit Thing ... and Smartphone Hardware Manufacturers Are Dead ...

iOS finished the quarter as the clear number 2 operating system, showing that, even without new product launches, demand remains strong. Moreover, Apple added new mobile operators to its camp, boosting short-term volumes and cementing long-term end-user relationships. What remains to be seen is how the new iOS 7 will be received once it reaches the market later this year, as much of the look and feel of the user interface has been revamped.

Windows Phone posted the largest year-over-year increase among the top five smartphone platforms, and in the process reinforced its position as the number 3 smartphone operating system. Driving this result was Nokia, which released two new smartphones and grew its presence at multiple mobile operators. But beyond Nokia, Windows Phone remained a secondary option for other vendors, many of which have concentrated on Android. By comparison, Nokia accounted for 81.6% of all Windows Phone smartphone shipments during 2Q13.

BlackBerry saw its market share decline during the quarter, reaching levels not seen in the history of IDC's Mobile Phone Tracker. However, BlackBerry has shown steady progress since the launch of its BB 10 platform, which has grown to three models, additional mobile operators, and a greater presence within its total volumes. It is still early days for the platform, however, and BlackBerry will need time and resources to evangelize more end users.

My opinion on Blackberry hasn't changed for 3 years... See Blackberries, Apples & Fruit Borne Successitis and BoomBustBlog Research Performs a RIM Job!

 

Top Smartphone Operating Systems, Shipments, and Market Share, 2013 Q3 (Units in Millions) 

Operating System

2Q13 Unit Shipments

2Q13 Market Share

2Q12 Unit Shipments

2Q12 Market Share

Year-over-Year Change

Android

187.4

79.3%

108

69.1%

73.5%

iOS

31.2

13.2%

26

16.6%

20.0%

Windows Phone

8.7

3.7%

4.9

3.1%

77.6%

BlackBerry OS

6.8

2.9%

7.7

4.9%

-11.7%

Linux

1.8

0.8%

2.8

1.8%

-35.7%

Symbian

0.5

0.2%

6.5

4.2%

-92.3%

Others

N/A

0.0%

0.3

0.2%

-100.0%

Total

236.4

100.0%

156.2

100.0%

51.3%


Source: IDC Worldwide Mobile Phone Tracker, August 7, 2013

This chart is intended for public use in online news articles and social media. Instructions on how to embed this graphic are available by clicking here.

Top Android Smartphone Vendors, Shipments, and Market Share, 2013 Q3 (Units in Millions) 

Vendor

2Q13 Unit Shipments

2Q13 Market Share

2Q12 Unit Shipments

2Q12 Market Share

Year-over-Year Change

Samsung

73.3

39.1%

48

44.4%

52.7%

LG

12.1

6.5%

5.8

5.4%

108.6%

Lenovo

11.4

6.1%

4.9

4.5%

132.7%

Huawei

10.2

5.4%

6.5

6.0%

56.9%

ZTE

10.2

5.4%

6.4

5.9%

59.4%

Others

70.2

37.5%

36.4

33.7%

92.9%

Total

187.4

100.0%

108.0

100.0%

73.5%

Source: IDC Worldwide Mobile Phone Tracker, August 7, 2013

Top Windows Phone Smartphone Vendors, Shipments, and Market Share, 2013 Q3 (Units in Millions) 

Vendor

2Q13 Unit Shipments

2Q13 Market Share

2Q12 Unit Shipments

2Q13 Market Share

Year-over-Year Change

Nokia

7.1

81.6%

4.1

83.7%

73.2%

Samsung

1.0

11.5%

0.3

6.1%

233.3%

HTC

0.4

4.6%

0.4

8.2%

0.0%

Huawei

0.2

2.3%

0.0

0.0%

N/A

Others

0.0

0.0%

0.1

2.0%

-100.0%

Total

8.7

100.0%

4.9

100.0%

77.6%

Source: IDC Worldwide Mobile Phone Tracker, August 7, 2013

Note: Data are preliminary and subject to change. Vendor shipments are branded shipments and exclude OEM sales for all vendors.

So, does Mr. Cook's lack of adherence to Steve Jobs wisdom portend a potentially uber-successful company misunderstood by the markets (meaning time to buy stock) or is this the beginning of the end of an iconic corporate era?

I refer my subscribers to the research documents below for the answers... 

Subscribers, download the Q3 2013 valuation reports (click here to subscribe).

The update from two months ago is also of value for those who haven't read it. It turns out that it was quite prescienct!

For Google...

Subscribers, click the following links for my updated price targets on Google (click here to subscribe) and read  Google Q2 2013 Update: Valuing Possibly The Most Powerful Co. In The World?:

The biggest risks to these price points are:

  1. A market that's being levitated by central bank magicians running short on magic spells...
  2. Regulatory pressure, which I feel is quite material and inevitable, but will not be a major factor in the near term.

Related links...

Was The Google Purchase of Motorola A Hardware Disaster With Overpriced Patents?

See also:

What Sell Side Wall Street Doesn't Understand About Apple - It's Not The Leader Of The Post PC World!!!

 The short call - October 2012, the month of Apple's all-time high and my call to subscribers to short the stock:  Deconstructing The Most Accurate Apple Analysis Ever Made - Share Price, Market Share, Strategy and All

Published in BoomBustBlog

Google has launched its first, conceived from scatch, phone - the Moto X. It was rumored to be priced between $200 to $250. This would have been a game changer for it meant that its competitors (who are also its business partners) would have had to slice thier margins to compete. As it turned out, the Moto X branded phones are priced at $199 on contract, ie. the same price as all of the other high end phones. The big problem with this is that the Moto X has middling specs as well as middling benchmark scores. That's a tad bit disappointing for us techie/nerds.

But then, I actually looked at the device and the business model around it. To beign with, Google/Motorola has focused on software rather than hardware. This is, in part, what Samsung has tried to do but Samsung is several generations behind Google Android, despite being able to piggyback off of Android functionality. By bringing the fight to the software cloud, Google can make drastic usability changes, some profound and some actually rather ubiquitous - simply not properly marketed.

A good example is reliance on Google Now, what Siri would look like if it actually worked. Ironically, this is probably the Moto X's killer app/feature. Google Now is by far my favorite mobile assistant. The catch is you can use it on any phone that runs Android 4.04 or higher - which is most phones. The difference with the Moto X is that it's always listening, and now you can use it without touching your phone. Even if your phone screen is off, once the command is given (video examples show "Ok Google Now") the Moto X will activate and offer the info you're looking for - which can be quite wide and varied. Android algorithms apparently learn your voice, so (theoretically) only a really good impersonator could activate your phone with voice.

Google has kept the device and the battery small, as well as the processor. This keeps costs down (ie. margins up), but more importantly left room for software innovations to shine without hardware overhead. Examples? The wake from sleep feature allows users to glance at the phone to get pertinent information without the phone fully powering up. If you look at most people commuting, walking, or just standing still, they glance at their phones very often. It's not as if this glance conveys tomes of information and besteller novels. By leaving the AMOLED screen dark and illuminating a small section to convey pertinent timely info such as the time, notifications, etc., significant power is saved (the screen is the signle biggest battery hog) while convenience and user experience is simultaneously increased. 

The choice of screens show that Google is aiming for the mainstream and not the bleeding edge. Although I prefer a 1080p screen for resolution, it drains the battery much faster than a 720p screen. I notice the difference clearly, but most people wouldn't, although they would notice the 40% difference in battery life.

Camera performance is increased, while costs are maintained, reference Moto X camera specs leak, 10MP stills and 1080p@ 60 fps video 

According to Taylor Wimberly, former editor for Android and Me, the Moto X will feature a 10MP Clear Pixel camera with a pixel size of 1.4 microns. This means the pixels will be larger than those on the Galaxy S4 sensor (1.1µm), but smaller than HTC One's (2µm). The bigger pixels, combined with the Clear Pixel technology should go a long way towards improving the low-light performance.

The Motorola Moto X camera is said to be capable of recording 1080p videos at 60 frames per second - a first for a smartphone. The camcorder will use pixel binning, combining information from 4 pixels to reduce noise and provide clearer videos.

Finally, the Moto X will pack three microphones and will be capable of recording 3D audio.

60 fps 1080p video is piercing professional video quality. This is coupled with an intuitive interface that uses the phones sensors to trigger and fire the app versus actual tactile manipulation, resulting in faster picture taking and more contextual use - all with the leading camera specs.

Here's more on this topic Here's a hint Ultra HD 4000 x 2000 pixels is the highest video specification available for consumer media products. Sony, Pioneer and Samsung have just released TVs that can display this stuff, starting at over $60k when first released.

The Moto X’s camera actually supports Ultra HD (you just can’t use it)

Motorola is counting on three things to make the Moto X a success: Google Now, multiple colors, and its Clear Pixel camera, and now some extra details about the latter have emerged thanks to manufacturer OmniVision. The new OV10820 [pdf link] sensor may not have a snappy name, but it’s a mighty capable chip, in fact able to capture 4k2k Ultra HD video.

moto_x_hands-on_sg_18

That’s assuming the rest of the device is up to the challenge, of course, which right now the Moto X is not. The new Motorola is in fact limited to 1080p HD video capture – which it can do with both its front and rear cameras, no less.

On paper, though, the OmniVision sensor is capable of a whole lot more. It can record up to 3840 x 2160 resolution video at 30fps, or up to 1920 x 1080 at up to 60fps, both at a native 16:9 widescreen aspect-ratio.

The sensor itself – described as RGB Clear (RGBC) – includes a fourth color filter for better low-light performance, which Motorola claims improves things by up to 75-percent on the Moto X.

... There are indications that the 10.5-megapixel sensor is only the start of things, too; the OV660 is in fact capable of handling up to 20-megapixel RGBC sensors, in addition to a secondary, front-facing RGBC sensor.

That could mean the same sort of low-light performance for your selfies in future iterations of the Moto X, though we’d be more interested in the potential of recording Ultra HD footage from a smartphone. Late last month, hints of Ultra HD support were spotted in Android 4.3 code, while long-standing rumors have suggested that the upcoming Sony “Honami” will support video recording at that resolution.

That is very serious for a small smartphone, and even more seriosu considering Motorola is keeping component costs down, thus working on increasing margins. I believe Google will do what Apple should have done, and that is it will create fatter margins and then commences to compress them themselves, in lieu of waiting for a competitor or new comer to do it for them. If so, expect these prices to either drop very, very quickly or expect this relatively new and apparently demanded technology to increase dramatically over a very short period of time - or worse for Samsung/Apple/Nokia/HTC,  both will occur simultanesouly. Expect the smartphone race to heat up substantially in just a few weeks. Samsung and Apple are going to have to pull some pretty big rabbits out of their asses! 

The customs order features are a unique edge. It remains to be seen how well this will work in the smartphone field, but then it again its awhat made Dell what it was!

What should we expect next? Well, for one it appears as if Google is taking the Moto X very, very seriously. How seriously? Let's count the ways...

2013 google io rumor roundup motorola nexus x

 Google is launching the Moto X on ALL major carriers simultanesouly, with no major skinning to the OS. That's right, damn near stock Android on every major outlet in the most lucrative cell phone markets - with direct access through Google Play Store. Sans the playstore, the only other OEM to do this was Samsung with the Galaxy S4, and you see how that turned out. In addition, Google is about to spend half of Apple’s annual marketing budget promoting a single phone...

Google's Moto X advertising budget will be up to half a billion dollars, or half as much as the $1 billion Apple spent advertising ALL of its products in 2012. Of course, the current Android handset leader Samsung's marketing budget topped out at $4 billion in 2012There's no big mystery as to why Samsung came out on top, eh?

Samsung’s advertising budget makes other tech companies look stingy.Asymco

Quoted from the quartz.com article linked above:

There is some industry precedent for getting ahead by spending heavily on advertising. Some have argued that Samsung’s dominance of Android smartphones and its market share victories against Apple are due almost entirely to Samsung’s massive advertising budget. While Apple failed to maintain its advertising spend as a percentage of revenue on its mobile devices—essentially coasting on existing brand recognition—Samsung ramped up its ad budget to more than 15% of sales.

Samsung’s spending on advertising goes up every quarter to keep pace with revenue.Asymco

Similarly, Google’s half-billion dollar advertising campaign could threaten Apple, but it’s more likely to threaten Samsung, which until now has been the market share leader in Android smartphones. Consumers will benefit as Google begins to compete directly with the companies that made Android so popular—so long as they can see through the massive fog of marketing that’s about to roll their way.

BoomBustBloggers knew this was coming as early as last year, reference Thoughts on Glass, Fashion, Fads, Moto X and Samsung's Phenomenal Yet Brief Trip To The Top

as well as:

Subscribers, click the following links for my updated price targets on Google (click here to subscribe) and read  Google Q2 2013 Update: Valuing Possibly The Most Powerful Co. In The World?:

The biggest risks to these price points are:

  1. A market that's being levitated by central bank magicians running short on magic spells...
  2. Regulatory pressure, which I feel is quite material and inevitable, but will not be a major factor in the near term.

Related links...

Was The Google Purchase of Motorola A Hardware Disaster With Overpriced Patents?

Published in BoomBustBlog

I have yet to release my review of Google's most recent quarter earnings results, but thus far I've seen nothing that would materially sway me from the conclusions drawn from the last set of forensic valuations released to subscribers (Google Q2 2013 Update: Valuing Possibly The Most Powerful Co. In The World?). One question that I am getting is "Did Google overpay for its Motorola acquisistion?"
Quick answer, I seriously do not think so. Please understand, the Wall Street fee/commission churning machine along with the tabloid financial media which has to churn content for advertising eyeballs has taught many (if not most) to view the investment world one fiscal quarter at a time. This is not a prudent, not sustainable model for building long term success. One of the most admirable traits of Google's management is their proclivity to think longer term, and to plan and invest accordingly.
Below are excerpts from the big Google report that I put out two years ago. It outlines the acquisitions that Google had made to date. Among these acquisitions are investments that the financial media and the sell side analytical community swore were overpriced because they actually ate their own BS sandwiches, literally convincing themselves that one quarter at a time is the way to run a business poised to take over an industry.

Three examples come to mind also happen to be three of the largest acquisitions - YouTube, AdMob and Android. Were they worth it? What single company controls and/or leads in internet video content distribution, computing OS (not just mobile OS, but all computing OSs), and mobile advertising? All three of these acquisitions amounted to less than $5 billion and for that amount and additional investment, Google literally and absolutely dominates each and every one of those industries. 
Google Final Report Sep 29 Page 53Google Final Report Sep 29 Page 53 copyGoogle Final Report Sep 29 Page 54Google Final Report Sep 29 Page 54 copy

Compare and contrast this to the Microsoft/Apple/Blackberry consortium that paid $4.5 billion for 6,000 telecomm related patents from Nortel. These companies are ALL currently lagging in growth and reach compared to Google, even if you just consider this one investment or if you look at their entire enterprise. The reason? Google's management is considerably more entrepenurial and are more adventurous at risk taking.

Google purchased Motorola for its cell industry patents for protection of its Android OS. Everything else that came with the deal was gravy. Factoring the handset/hardware biz, the set top box biz (recently sold) and the patents, the patents were purchased extremely cheap (17,000 of them) compared to what the RIMM/MSFT/Apple consortium paid for the Nortel patents ($4.5B for 6,000 patents). Even with the patent value significantly downgraded, it's still was a better deal than its competitors. Motorola can now be used to directly drive down the cost of hardware and hardware profit margins.

Motorola sales price in billions
Purchase  $(12.50)
Sale of Set Top Division  $2.35
7 years tax loss carryforward  $5.60
2012 Motorola Mobility US NOL  $1.00
2012 Motorola Mobility Foreign NOL  $0.70
Net Purchase Cost for 17,000 patents & Motorola Mobility handset business  $(2.85)
Cost per patent  $167,647 This is a rough estimation to use as a gauge. Each patent is different, of course!
Recent Microsoft Rulling against Google demands $1.8M annual licensing fee for 2 patents.
Using this ruling, which was widely considered a loss of Google, we get the following ANNUAL yield on investment 537%
One must realize that Google Purchased 17,000 patents and the first cell phone manufactuer as well as one of the top tier manufacturers for nearly half of the their competition paid for just 6000 patents - RIMM/MSFT/Apple consortium paid $4.5 B for 6,000 Nortel patents.
Google will use the Motorola Mobility unit to further push down smartphone margins and costs instead of using it to make more profitable phones. Remember, Google is in the data business, not the smartphone business. The more people that have smartphones at any cost, the more money Google makes.   

One of the reasons why I think Google's missing of the mean analysts forcasts this quarter is not that big a deal is the extremely value rich product pipeline of product's nearing launch. As a beta tester and early explorer of Google Glass, I'm convinced that Microsoft, Blackberry and Apple have absolutely nothing to compare. Expect Google to expand its advantage over these companies materially over the next fiscal year.

Here I present...

Glass for the Hospitality Industry

Glass for Real Estate

Subscribers, click the following links for my updated price targets on Google (click here to subscribe) and read  Google Q2 2013 Update: Valuing Possibly The Most Powerful Co. In The World?:

The biggest risks to these price points are:

  1. A market that's being levitated by central bank magicians running short on magic spells...
  2. Regulatory pressure, which I feel is quite material and inevitable, but will not be a major factor in the near term. 
Published in BoomBustBlog

Following up on my timely post "Here Come Those Municipal Defaults That Everyone Said Couldn't Happen, Pt 2", I comment on Meredith Whitney's OpEd in the Financial Times. If you remember, she - like I - warned of municipal defaults years ago and was ridiculed for such. Ms. Whitney is quoted as saying:

"As jarring as the reality may be to accept, Detroit's decision last week to declare bankruptcy should not be regarded as a one-off in the U.S. municipal market." she said.

"There are five more towns like Detroit in Michigan alone. There are many more municipalities across the country in similar positions."

"The bill for promises past is now so large for some cities and towns that it is crowding out money for the most basic of services – in the case of Detroit, it could not even afford to run its traffic lights," she said.

"Will [lawmakers] side with taxpayers, unions or the municipal bondholders? If they back residents, money will be directed to underfunded public services at the expense of pensions and bondholders. If they side with the unions, social services will continue to be cut and the risk to bondholders will increase considerably. If they side with bondholders, social services and pensions are at risk."

In the case of Detroit, elected officials, for the first time in a very long time, are siding with residents, Whitney said. This is a new precedent that boils down to the straightforward reality of the survival and sustainability of a town or city, she said.

"After decades of near-third-world conditions in the richest country in the world, the city finally stood up and said enough was enough,"

Well, this is the problem. Defaulting on revenue bonds where the underlying asset (ex. a housing project, utility, or infrastructure project) is not generating the sufficient cash flows is part and parcel of the risk of investing in said class of bonds. This is widely accepted and understood, which is likely why those bonds have a slightly higher yield.

For some obscene reason, defaulting on the general obligation bonds which purportedly carry the "full faith and credit' of the municipality as a back stop is deemed as wholly different affair. The reason? Who the hell knows? This is a point I tried to drive home in the original  Here Come Those Municipal Defaults That Everyone Said Couldn't Happen article in 2011. Backing by the full faith and credit of a public entity does not make an investment risk free. To the contrary, if said entity is fundamentally insolvent, the investment is actually "riskful"as opposed to risk free.

Treating these bonds as unsecured in the bankruptcy is essentially the way to go. If you don't want to do that, well you can still consider them backed by the full faith and credit of the insolvent municipality, which is essentially unsecured - and move on anyway - particularly as many potential collateral assets of value would have likely been encumbered by agreements with a little more prejudicial foresight.

A GO default from a city the size of Detroit will dramatically change the face of GO bonds going forward. Now that the hoi polloi and tax free investing masses have been awakened, a true accounting of the risks involved will cause a much more realistic risk premium to be placed on GO bonds everywhere.  This wll be in addition to the natural increase of rates coming from the end of a 28 year natural bull market in bonds, in addition to the economic and market snapback borne from the end of the artificial eztension of said bull makret through ZIRP and direct credit market maniputlation by the Fed.

Yes, a triple whammy coming to a bankrupt (or soon to be) state, city, town, or political subdivsion near you!

The good news? Those pension funds that hold municipal assets (due to the uneccesary tax shielding from muni's in a qualified account, not many) will get a higher yield on their bonds. The bad news? That yeild likey will not get paid!

This may push rates higher in general, after all they're artificially low to begin with. ZIRP has done it's fair share of damage, and a snap back to market rates will hurt all the more...

And then there's those monolines who're just working out that 90x leverage problem from the housing crisis (reference A Super Scary Halloween Tale of 104 Basis Points Pt I & II, by Reggie Middleton)...

And then...

Of course, we can't leave out those rating agencies who warned us all about the impending doom...

And from the must read post, Banks, Monolines, and Ratings Agencies As The Three Card Monte (Wall)Street Hustlers! Its a Sucker's Bet, Who's Going to Fall for it in QE2?

Three Card Monte is a scam designed to separate a fool from his/her money. It is quite efficient, particularly when fools are involved!

The Boogie Down Bronx

The big secret to the Morgan Monte Scam is that it is 10% sleight of hand and 90% teamwork. Even if you are not deft enough to capture the sleight of hand, the key in avoiding it is to recognize the team players, whose key player is often YOU - The Mark!

The retail/typical qualified fund investor = "The Mark"

Monolines/FIRE sector= The Operator/Hustler!

Sell Side analysts = "Jess"

Rating agencies = "Paul"

How its done in the UK

Reenactment of 2009's entire year of Wall Street earnings

How its done on Wall Street, see outset...

Next, up we let the late Biggie school you on how Wall Street banks follow the Ten Crack Commandments!

Published in BoomBustBlog

Last Wednesday I posted BS... Defined: Bernanke Seeks (BS) to Divorce QE Tapering From Interest Rates - OR - Economic Prestidigitation! wherein I ridiculed the notion of being able to withdraw economic financial aid while expecting rates not to spike. The fact of the matter is we are the at the end of a 33 year old bull market in credit. Or, to put it more accurately, we are at the end of a 5 year synthetic extension of a 28 year old credit market bull run....

I urge readers to keep in mind what I expoused in Apple Bonds Proven To Have A Nasty Taste wherein Apple bonds lose 9% in six weeks:

We Clearly & Obviously Ending A 3 Decade Bull Market, Likely At The Tail End Of The Largest Global ZIRP Experiment Ever!

And this final aspect is the kicker. We are likely culminating the end of a three decade secular bull market in bonds. Why in the world would anyone want to buy debt now, in a good, bad or mediocore company? Reference a chart of ten year rates over time, and you will see that once you get this close to zero (and the applied end to excessive ZIRP), there's no way to go but up. As excerpted from theMarket Realist site:

Yes, this goes for muni investors as well! Municipalities have a dual edged sword up the ass. Not only are higher funding rates to be expected from a shifting market, but the actual fundamentals of municipalities are in the crapper as well, putting an even larger premium on what is already a steep increase in funding costs. What do  you think happens next?

It's not as if we couldn't see this coming a mile away - or at least 2 to 5 years ago...

Wednesday, 14 May 2008 The Municipal bond market and the securitization crisis

ARS market – composition as on 31 December 2007

image004.gif

Student loans? Ruh Oh!

Saturday, 24 May 2008 The Municipal Bond Market and the Asset Securitization Crisis, pt 2

image001.gif

Thursday, 20 January 2011 Here Come Those Municipal Defaults That Everyone Said Couldn't Happen

In the multifamily housing segment, default rates increased significantly and were extremely high for the period 1987-90, i.e. at the time of the S&L crisis when real estate lending was reckless due to declining lending standards by banks and other financial institutions. The default rate peaked in 1988 in the eleven year period reviewed to 4.31%, followed by 3.41% in 1989.

 Don't let me say I told you so. Will those monolines start feeling part 2 of credit crunch?

Ambac is Effectively Insolvent & Will See More ... 

What is the Fallout of the Ambac Bankruptcy on the ...

My Analyst's Comments on MBIA/Ambac/Moody's ...

Moody's Affirms Ratings of Ambac and MBIA

Published in BoomBustBlog

Bloomberg reports: Bernanke Seeks to Divorce QE Tapering From Interest Rates

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke will have a chance to use testimony to Congress today to drive home his message that winding down asset purchases won’t presage an increase in the Fed’s benchmark interest rate.

Bernanke has said the Fed may start reducing $85 billion in monthly bond purchases later this year, assuming economic growth meets the Fed’s predictions. At the same time, policy makers’ forecasts have indicated the federal funds rate won’t rise until 2015, long after Bernanke’s second term ends Jan. 31.

... Treasury 10-year note yields were little changed at 2.53 percent as of 8:38 a.m. London time. They touched 2.51 percent yesterday, the lowest since July 5, in anticipation of Bernanke’s testimony, even as economic reports showed that U.S. industrial production rose by the most in four months in June and inflation picked up toward the Fed’s goal, supporting the case for a reduction in quantitative easing.

“He’ll say a slowing in the pace of asset purchases isn’t a tightening of policy, and it’s actually still an easing of policy just at a slower pace,” said Josh Feinman, the New York-based global chief economist for Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management, which oversees $400 billion, and a former Fed senior economist. “It doesn’t imply that they’re going to be tightening policy any time soon. They’re not.”

Global stocks and bonds retreated after Bernanke on June 19 outlined the conditions that would prompt the Federal Open Market Committee to reduce and eventually end asset purchases. His remarks pushed the yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury to a 22-month high and erased $3 trillion in value from global equity market value over five days.

Technically, Bernanke can say that he can taper bond purchases without raising the Fed Benchmark interest rate, for he can. He is in complete control of said rate. Reality dictates something a little different though. The Fed benchmark interest rate doesn't equal market rates. Ask Dr. Greenspan how difficult it is to get mother market rate to bend to your will by simply manipulating the Fed benchmark rate. He lost control (as if he ever had it) of market rates during his term as he tried to play economic god. Expect the same efforts and the same results from Bernanke.

I urge readers to keep in mind what I expoused in Apple Bonds Proven To Have A Nasty Taste wherein Apple bonds lose 9% in six weeks:

We Clearly & Obviously Ending A 3 Decade Bull Market, Likely At The Tail End Of The Largest Global ZIRP Experiment Ever!

And this final aspect is the kicker. We are likely culminating the end of a three decade secular bull market in bonds. Why in the world would anyone want to buy debt now, in a good, bad or mediocore company? Reference a chart of ten year rates over time, and you will see that once you get this close to zero (and the applied end to excessive ZIRP), there's no way to go but up. As excerpted from theMarket Realist site:

 

Published in BoomBustBlog

This is a guest post from Marcus Holland. I don't endorse nor necessarily agree with the opinion and research expressed herein, and it is supplied as an OpEd piece only.

_______________________________________

Apple Stock (NYSE:AAPL) is trading slightly lower despite news that the company colluded with five major U.S. publishers to drive up the prices of e-books in the months ahead of the technology company entering the market in 2010.  Option volatility in the wake of this news, has declined slightly and sentiment surrounding the company has remained strong.

In a civil antitrust lawsuit, the Department of Justice claimed that Apple agreed with the 5 publishers in January 2010 to allow them to increase prices for best sellers and new releases in response to publisher Amazon.com $9.99 price point for those books on Amazon.com Inc.

The judge will likely schedule a hearing on a request by the Justice Department for injunctive relief, which could include requirements that Apple not enter into another agency agreement to sell e-books for a two-year period.

aapl stock range

Despite the blow to Apple the stock technically remains sound after recently testing support near 390 per share.  Resistance on the stock is seen near the 50-day moving average near 433.  Momentum on the stock is gaining traction as the MACD has recently generated a buy signal.  This occurs when the spread (the 12-day moving average minus the 26-day moving average) crosses above the 9-day moving average of the spread.  The RSI (relative strength index) is printing in the middle of the neutral range near 50, well below the overbought levels of 70 and and above the oversold levels of 30.

aapl stock volatility

Implied volatility on AAPL edged higher, prior to the release of the decision and ahead of earnings in the coming weeks.  The recent lows near 25% represent an excellent opportunity to purchase volatility, while levels near 45% reflect a robust place to sell volatility.  At the current levels near 30%, options traders who are bullish on the stock could use a risk reversal and use the skew on the puts to benefit from the structure.  The structure mitigates the effect of implied volatility on a directional play.

In a risk reversal the investor will purchase a call and use the proceeds of a sold put to finance the trade.  A trade that would allow an investor to earn theta is an August 450-390 risk reversal in which the investor collect 10s cents by purchasing the 450 call for $5.20 and selling the 390 put for $5.30.  By using recent support at $390, and investor has a good spot to purchase the stock if Apple’s stock turns lower.

Comments from Reggie on the fundamental side...

The Apple Profit Engine Has Stalled & Is Rolling Downhill

Apple is facing a shart decline in the margins of its top two value drivers. May I also add that these two value drivers are 83% of Apple's revenues and an even greater portion of its profits. Such a drastic concentration in only two products who have reached their zenith is not a good thing!

Click the graphic once to view, twice to enlarge to printer quality...

Reggie Middletonss Ultimate Apple Value Infographic

Apple's Competition Is The Greatest It Has EVER Been!

Apple's competition is the greatest it has ever been, and features companies who are literally at the top of their game. We are talking a lot of companies, and at the top of a very difficiult game as well. Reference What Sell Side Wall Street Doesn't Understand About Apple - It's Not The Leader Of The Post PC World!!!

Apple is Materially & Quickly Losing Global Market Share! Clear Indicators Of Permanent Downward Moves In Its Peer Group

Apple is rapidly losing global market share over and the trend is worsening. This has ALWAYS signaled the beginning of the end for its peers. Reference Is Tim Cook Cooked? Market Share vs Profit Margin, part 2 - Follow What I Do, Not What I Say!

For those who don't subscribe and/or haven't already seen it, here is the video that tells (nearly) all about Apple, from beginning (Q3 2010) to end.

Of course, there is a point at which Apple is a good buy. After all, they have a lot going for them. The question du jour is, exactly what is that point? I refer my subscribers to the research documents below for the answers... 

Subscribers, download the Q3 2013 valuation reports (click here to subscribe).

The update from two months ago is also of value for those who haven't read it. It turns out that it was quite prescient!

  1. File Icon Apple 1Q2013 update - Pro & Institutional
    (Technology)
  2. File Icon Apple 1Q2013 update - Retail
    (Technology)

 

Published in BoomBustBlog

Facebook Recommendations