Those looking for a more conventional method of observing consumer patterns can find similar conclusions by looking at Federal Reserve data on consumer credit. Both revolving and non-revolving credit lines have decreased over the past year, indicating it is still not yet worth it to take on more debt for a tapped out American consumer. The biggest contradiction with BEA statistics that can be drawn directly from Federal Reserve data is related to automobile sales data. Even as motor vehicle output continues to climb according to the BEA, Federal Reserve data shows that interest rates on auto loans have risen each quarter since the end of Cash for Clunkers, and the average amount financed has fallen each quarter as well. Such contradicting data should raise more question marks about whether or not the consumer recovery is really out of the woods (or if it will ever leave the woods).
For those who have not yet read it, the post What We’re Looking For To Go Splat! Part 2 reviews 147 retail companies whose operating margins and leverage caused us to take a second (or third) look at their ability to whether the storm. Subscribers should reference
Retail Short Analysis for the four companies that made the short list and the reasons behind short-listing them.
The previous "Splat" post (part 1) dove a little deeper into the macro perspective:
Those companies that serve and rely on these very same consumers’ ability to spend are quite sensitive to the macro environment. Notice, I said the companies, not necessarily the companies’ securities – at least not yet. So, what does the macro/fundamental outlook look like? Let’s glance at personal consumption over the 12 years or so…
Notice that the only real recovery is in the volatile energy sector, and that is not discretionary! Automobiles, clothing, furnishing, etc. are looking yucky!Notice that the only real recovery is in the volatile energy sector, and that is not discretionary! Automobiles, clothing, furnishing, etc. are looking yucky!
Notice that the only real recovery is in the volatile energy sector, and that is not discretionary! Automobiles, clothing, furnishing, etc. are looking yucky!
And this just in from CNBC: Spending Beats Income Gain as Consumers Tap Savings
Consumer spending increased as expected in March for a sixth straight month as consumers dipped into their savings, confirming the robust spending growth.
That's some spin, eh? Consumers dip into their savings to buy things, denoting a poorer consumer that cannot subsist off of income alone. Yet, this news channel sees it fit to say that this confirms "robust spending growth". To think some people wonder why blogs are becoming more popular...

Tweet me!
