China's Central Bank Eliminates Margin T…

19-01-2017 Hits:260 BoomBustBlog Reggie Middleton

China's Central Bank Eliminates Margin Trading of Bitcoin

There have been rumors that the Chinese Central Bank (PBoC - People's Bank of China) would limit or eliminate margin trading in Bitcoin. It is now official, sort of...

Read more

Is Donald Trump Truly Successful or Born…

18-01-2017 Hits:444 BoomBustBlog Reggie Middleton

Is Donald Trump Truly Successful or Born With A Silver Spoon? An Analysis

In social media and mainstream media, I often hear Donald Trump quoted (by himself, and others) as an extremely successful, self-made man. As an entrepreneur for nearly all of my...

Read more

As I Promised, EU Is Colliding Into Prac…

17-01-2017 Hits:848 BoomBustBlog Reggie Middleton

As I Promised, EU Is Colliding Into Practical Confines of NIRP, Bank Hemorrhaging Up Next

Nearly a year ago, I warned subscribers of consequences stemming from the ECB's negative interest rate program. Here's an exceprt from our resarch report titled European Banking Macro Issues for March...

Read more

Is Bitcoin Too Risky? Whenever the Bitco…

12-01-2017 Hits:1489 BoomBustBlog Reggie Middleton

Is Bitcoin Too Risky? Whenever the Bitcoin is Mentioned in Financial Pop Media, Ignorance Ensues

I hate to be the one to break bad news to you, but most of the pop media/mainstream media financial pundits that I hear and see opine on bitcoin have...

Read more

What Happens When Rates Rise While the S…

10-01-2017 Hits:1135 BoomBustBlog Reggie Middleton

What Happens When Rates Rise While the S&P 500 Relies on Cheap Credit To Boost EPS?

So, the stock market, bond market and real estate markets are all at all-time highs. Everything is Awesome! You know better than that. You see, when the bond market wakes...

Read more

Debt Encumbered Oil, Sovereign Soil, Toi…

10-01-2017 Hits:641 BoomBustBlog Reggie Middleton

Debt Encumbered Oil, Sovereign Soil, Toil & Trouble: Can't You Hear Seems Cracking in the OPEC Empire?

@WSJ reports Libya Ramping Up Oil Production, Threatening OPEC (supposed) Plans to lift global oil place by artificially limiting supply. This would be in violation of federal antii-trust laws in the...

Read more

Ten Years Since BoomBustBlog Was 1st Pub…

09-01-2017 Hits:964 BoomBustBlog Reggie Middleton

Ten Years Since BoomBustBlog Was 1st Published & That Initial Research Still Relevant Today

We have looked into insurance companies' performance last month in regards to our bearish real estate thesis. A small comederie of companies are suffering losses and/or declining profits as we've exected....

Read more

The Macro Truth About The Big Bitcoin Po…

07-01-2017 Hits:1136 BoomBustBlog Reggie Middleton

Bitcoin has dropped precipitously, and as is usual, we have the cacophony of instant digital currency pundits cackling about as if they had a clue. This is the inaugural post...

Read more

To Bust or Not To Bust: Are We In A Real…

04-01-2017 Hits:811 BoomBustBlog Reggie Middleton

To Bust or Not To Bust: Are We In A Real Estate Bubble?

Banks are showing thin NIM, yet many of the big banks are able to boast stable if not slightly improving credit metrics. This doesn’t make sense considering the explosive growth...

Read more

What Happens To Real Asset Lending Banks…

03-01-2017 Hits:658 BoomBustBlog Reggie Middleton

What Happens To Real Asset Lending Banks When the Real Funding Rate Appears? We're About to Find Out

During the financial crisis of 2008, money market funds who subjectively agreed to hold their NAV (net asset value) unit prices at $1 “broke the buck”. That is, the unit...

Read more

Stress Test on Banks’ Earnings Facing th…

30-06-2014 Hits:44788 BoomBustBlog Reggie Middleton

Stress Test on Banks’ Earnings Facing the Veritaseum UltraCoin Value Transaction Platform

My last post on the topic of disintermediation during a paradigm shift was Wall Street Should Be First To Invest In Reggie Middleton's UltraCoin, Much Of It Won't Be Here In...

Read more

Introducing the "Unbreakable Promis…

09-06-2014 Hits:39570 BoomBustBlog Reggie Middleton

Introducing the "Unbreakable Promise" As a Method Increasing Efficiencies and Decreasing Risk

Continuing on the margin compression theme originally laid out in Margin Compression Is Coming in the Payment Processing Space As $100 Million Pours Into Startups, I illustrate mathematically how the bit...

Read more

I have very little confidence in MBIA's management. They literally calling out to the weak handed short sellers that missed their recent 56+ point share drop to just jump on the bandwagon. Management is what you actually bet for when long a stock, and ultimately who you will be betting against when shorting a stock.  It appears as if MBIA's management is a safe short bet given this macro environment!


Fitch Ratings-New York-10 March 2008: Fitch Ratings President and CEO Stephen W. Joynt today sent a letter to MBIA in response to its letter of March 7, 2008 requesting that Fitch withdraw the company's IFS ratings.


Below is the full text of the letter from Fitch Ratings to MBIA:

March 10, 2008

Mr. Joseph W. Brown
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
113 King Street
Armonk, NY 10504

Dear Mr. Brown:

I am writing in response to your letter to Fitch Ratings delivered to us this past Friday requesting that we withdraw MBIA's Insurer Financial Strength (IFS) rating, but maintain MBIA's debt ratings.

Regarding the commercial relationship between MBIA and Fitch, as I suggested to you in our meeting on Friday, we are empathetic to the financial and operational stress MBIA is presently undergoing and are aware of the significant cost containment measures you are initiating. We are, therefore, willing to continue our ratings without charge to MBIA. I assume, in the interest of your stakeholders, that you will be seeking and will receive equal concessions and/or sizable fee reductions from both S&P and Moody's.

In addition, I would like clarification of your intentions regarding cooperation with our rating process. You stated in your March 7 press release, and in your letter to us of the same date, that you would like us to withdraw our IFS ratings, but continue rating MBIA's debt securities. Separately, by email sent a day later on March 8 (a copy of which is attached hereto) you requested that we return or destroy key portfolio information and discontinue all use of that information in proceeding with our rating analysis. It seems disingenuous at best to assert in your letter to investors published yesterday, March 9 (footnote 1), that you "intend to work with Fitch to perform the analysis needed to rate [MBIA's] debt securities", while privately demanding return of the portfolio information and materials that you freely provided to support our ratings and that of other rating agencies for many years.

It would appear that rather than "work with Fitch" your intention could be to emasculate our opinion by withholding information and subsequently discredit our opinion as being uninformed.

In your letter, you also state that the value of IFS ratings in today's volatile capital markets is disconnected from individual instruments insured by MBIA and "overwhelmed by the forces of trading markets in unrelated securities." If you believe that, then you should request withdrawal of all rating agencies' IFS ratings.

Your conflicting views lead me to question whether it is the Fitch capital model, rating process or fees that you object to or rather is it that you are aware we are continuing our analytical review and may conclude that, in our view, MBIA's insurer financial strength is no longer 'AAA'.

I believe the central issue is MBIA's financial strength and the value of your insurance policies to investors, not the value of an IFS rating. It seems an unusual first step in attempting to rebuild MBIA's reduced credibility with investors to limit information, decrease transparency
and restrict "informed opinions" (which I believe Fitch has) just because we may not conclude that MBIA is a 'AAA' company.

I believe that the best way forward for MBIA to reestablish the value of its products in the market is to make more information available to more rating agencies rather than just aligning MBIA with Standard & Poor's and Moody's.

For clarification purposes, I ask that you please address the following questions:

-- Will you provide typical management reports, qualitative risk limit information, and other private information (with the exception of portfolio specific details) that are typically provided to NRSRO's by all rated public financial institutions?

-- Do you expect to provide access to management comparable to the access provided by rated public financial institutions?

-- Since you are requesting we continue our public securities ratings, can you affirm that you regard the information and access you intend to provide should be sufficient for a NRSRO to form a reasoned conclusion about the creditworthiness of your company?

We are considering your request that we withdraw the IFS ratings and return the portfolio information you previously provided us and will be consulting with regulators, issuers, investors and our own advisors and expect to announce publicly our views in the next several days.

Very truly yours,
Stephen W. Joynt
President and Chief Executive Officer
Fitch Ratings

Footnote 1
-- Available at:
-- Also Investor Letter: Part 1:


MBIA Email to Fitch Ratings

To: , ,
From: "Pastore, Fred"
Date: 03/08/2008 03:42PM
cc: "Chaplin, Chuck" , "Wertheim, Ram"
Subject: Confidential MBIA Information

As noted in our letter delivered Friday afternoon, we request that Fitch remove from its MATRIX model input files all non-public details of our insured portfolio. This includes, but is not limited to:

--the "lower of" ratings information of other rating agencies;

--MBIA's internal ratings for all transactions;

--transaction level insured exposure data (i.e., gross and net par outstanding) and any other risk identification data (e.g., risk sector classifications, maturity date, country of risk);

-- details of MBIA's reinsurance cessions;

-- non-public details relating to MBIA's asset management business.

Since this non public information was provided in connection with the ongoing IFS ratings of MBIA and given our request for Fitch to immediately withdraw the ratings, we request that the use of such information for any purpose be immediately suspended, in particular for use in Fitch's MATRIX model.

Going forward, we do not intend to provide the detailed insured portfolio data necessary to run Fitch's capital model. In accordance the licensing agreement with Fitch, we will return the CD ROM containing the model program files and certify under a separate letter that we have deleted all copies of the program from our network, desktop computers and any other file storage devises.

We also request that Fitch return or destroy all non-public, confidential reports and insured transaction documents. This includes, but is not limited to:

-- quarterly Insured Portfolio Management Report;

-- quarterly Market Risk Reports;

-- MBIA underwriting memos, Offering Circulars, Indentures, Swap Confirms and any other transaction documents relating to MBIA's insured structured finance CDOs.

As we continue to evaluate our 5-year transformation plan, and as Fitch continues to develop its own business in the global capital markets, we expect that there will be opportunities to work with Fitch for ratings on the Company's future insurance entities.


Media Relations: Kenneth Reed, New York, Tel: +1 212-908-0540.

Fitch's rating definitions and the terms of use of such ratings are available on the agency's public site, ''. Published ratings, criteria and methodologies are available from this site, at all times. Fitch's code of conduct, confidentiality, conflicts of interest, affiliate firewall, compliance and other relevant policies and procedures are also available from the 'Code of Conduct' section of this site.