PDF Print E-mail

Lennar, Voodoo & the Year of the Living Dead!

User Rating: / 2
PoorBest 
Written by Reggie Middleton   
Saturday, 09 February 2008

For those that wondered what my stance on Lennar is after raising cash through property sales and tax refunds, here is my update to the Voodoo analysis. 

Summary

The worst housing slump in recent history has taken its toll on US home builders, with most of them reporting consecutive quarterly losses in the second half of 2007. Lennar, in particular, reported negative earnings for the fifth consecutive quarter in 4Q2007, witnessing a negative EPS of $6.08 compared with a negative $1.23 in 4Q2006. Its large inventory write-down of approximately $2.4 bn in 2007 along with losses on land sale deal with Morgan Stanley Real Estate significantly impacted its operating performance in 2007. As the US housing woes deepen amid deteriorating US and global economic fundamentals and the economy edges definitively closer to the hard landing that we I have been anticipating I believe that declining consumer confidence and buying power will continue to impact housing demand. This should further depress Lennar's new home prices in 2008 and 2009 and significantly impact its operating and net profit margins..

Key Points

  • Disappointing 4Q2007 results - Lennar's revenues declined 49.0% to $2.2 bn in 4Q2007 versus $4.3 bn in 4Q2006. Revenues from the homebuilding segment declined 50.5% to $1.9 bn in 4Q2007 from $4.0 bn in 4Q2006, primarily off a 50.4% decline in home deliveries and a 2.1% decline in average sale price. Lennar's new home orders declined 50.4% to 4,761 units in 4Q2007 from 9,606 units in 4Q2006. As Lennar reduced its existing inventory through price incentives, its order backlog declined 65.5% y-o-y to 4,009 units at the end of 4Q2007 with an operating backlog of 64 days. In addition, Lennar also reported a $1.8 bn charge relating to valuation adjustment write-off including $0.17 bn for goodwill write-offs. Overall, Lennar witnessed its highest quarterly loss in 4Q2007, with diluted earnings of a negative $6.08 per share compared to a negative of $1.23 in 4Q2006.
  • Lennar inching closer to bankruptcy - The current downturn in the US housing sector, which has resulted in large scale cut backs in new home construction and prices, has significantly impacted Lennar's financial position. Lennar witnessed a loss of $1.9 bn in 2007, which had the impact of eroding its equity nearly 33% to $3.8 bn at the end of 2007 from $5.7 bn at the end of 2006. Lennar's Z-score has declined to 1.69 at the end of 4Q2007 from 2.32 at the end of 3Q2007, indicating that the homebuilder is approaching insolvency. Although the company's current cash and other liquid assets suggest reasonable liquidity position as of the end of December 2007, expected losses in 2008 and 2009 on account of fast declining home prices and subdued demand will significantly impact its financial position.
  • Large inventory impairment and write-down - In 2007, Lennar recorded a huge $2.4 bn charge on account of inventory impairment under FAS144 in 2007 compared with $501.8 mn in 2006 owing to fast declining home prices in its key markets. With the US residential sector not expected to recover over the next couple of years, we believe Lennar would continue to write down its inventory until 2010. We expect Lennar to record $221 mn and $139 mn of inventory impairment in 2008 and 2009, respectively to accurately reflect the market value of its inventories in view of further decline in U.S residential housing prices.
  • Decline in order book - In 4Q2007, Lennar had 4,761 new order units while it delivered 7,044 units, thus reducing its order backlog to 4,009 units from 6,367 at the end of 3Q2007. Lennar's order backlog declined from 18,565 units at the end of 2005 to 4,009 units at the end of 2007, primarily owing a to decline in new orders coupled with Lennar's attempt to lower its inventory levels through sale of existing inventory through price incentives to maintain liquidity in the ‘cash squeezed' global credit market. As a result, Lennar's order backlog in operating days declined to 64 days at the end of 4Q2007. A reduction in order backlog in conditions of weakening demand would put pressure on the company's revenue growth in the near-to-medium term.
  • Dismantling joint-ventures agreements - As the housing market continues to deteriorate, Lennar is re-evaluating its joint venture arrangements and reducing the number of joint ventures, particularly those with recourse debt. At the end of 4Q2007, the number of joint venture agreement was 210 versus 270 at the end of 4Q2006. Additionally, Lennar had also reduced ownership interest in joint ventures to an average 34% in 4Q2007 from 39% in 4Q2006. As a result, Lennar reduced its total debt in joint ventures to $5.1 bn at the end of 4Q2007 from $5.5 billion at the end of 3Q2007 while also reducing its exposure to recourse debt in joint ventures to $1 bn from $1.8 bn at the end of the 4Q2006. To meet the conditions under the amended credit covenants, Lennar further plans to reduce its JV recourse debt by $300 mn and $200 mn in 2008 and 2009, respectively. However, Lennar's expected (high) debt-to-total capital ratio of 52.9% and 58.8% by the end of 2008 and 2009 (including JV's debt), respectively, could negatively impact its financial position in case the housing woes worsen in the coming months. 
  • Financial engineering by Lennar - By concluding the deal with Morgan Stanley Real Estate towards the end of FY2007 involving the sale of 11,000 lots for $1.3 bn at a 60% discount, Lennar could claim losses of $775 mn from the transaction and obtain a tax refund of $270 mn (part of overall refund of $852 mn) against taxes paid in successful years of operation (2005 and 2006). Further, the possibility that the two year carry-back period under tax rules could get extended to five years would bail out Lennar from potential liquidity problems to some extent since it could claim refund of taxes from 2002 onwards and resultantly, may not opt for selling its land at current lower prices.
  • Lennar's sizeable cash balances as at end of 4Q2007 - At the end of 4Q2007, Lennar had cash of $795.2 million. Of-late Lennar has improved its overall cash position by generating cash through lowering of its inventory levels and sale of land.  Besides, Lennar also sold $1.3 billion worth of assets for $525 mn to a joint venture established with Morgan Stanley Real Estate. In February 2008, Lennar's joint venture LandSource admitted MW Housing Partners as its strategic partner and obtained $1.6 bn of non-recourse financing. The above transaction resulted in a cash distribution of $707.6 mn to Lennar.  Subsequent to 4Q2007, Lennar had also collected $852 mn by recovering taxes paid in prior years through losses generated in 2007.
  • Lennar's large mortgage operations are now truly  feeling the pain of the credit squeeze - During 2007, Lennar originated approximately 30,900 mortgage loans of approximately $7.7 bn. Substantially all the loans the Financial Services segment originates are sold in the secondary mortgage market on a servicing released, non-recourse basis. However, Lennar remains liable for certain limited representations and warranties related to loan sales. We believe that difficult conditions in the credit market will impact the spreads for Lennar. In 4Q2007, Lennar's margins in the financial segment deteriorated drastically from 26.2% in 4Q2006 to a negative 23.2% in 4Q2007. We expect Financial Services revenues to decline 50% and 6.1% in 2008 and 2009, respectively, and margin to be negatively impacted with a negative margin of 36.4% and 28.4% in 2008 and 2009.
  •  

    Although the end of 4Q2007 saw Lennar with sizeable cash balances, we believe that the company is still considerably leveraged with debt-to-equity of 74.2% at the end of 4Q2007. At the end of 4Q2007, Lennar had net debt of $2.0 bn as a stand alone entity while as a consolidated entity including JV's recourse debt was $2.5 bn. Moreover, we believe that the cash balance will be eroded by operating losses in the coming years, requiring the company to raise further debt amid conditions of deteriorating housing sector.

     

    Download the full update, complete with pro formas, Z-score and valuation:

    icon Lennar Update 02-07-08 (3.69 MB)



    Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
    Reddit! Del.icio.us! JoomlaVote! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Yahoo! Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
    Trackback(0)
    Comments (9)Add Comment
    676
    ...
    written by Robert Cote, February 09, 2008
    2006 owing to fast declining home prices in its key markets.

    Wasn't it both housing inventory (in-process and completed) and raw land values that caused the markdown?
    62
    ...
    written by Reggie Middleton, February 10, 2008
    This is a circular argument. In process inventory and raw land are valued based upon the value of completed homes. If the finished product drops in value, then everything else drops as well, and it is not linear. Raw land drops more than in process inventory, which drops more than finished housing (significant difference in liquidity).
    387
    Have you read this blog?
    written by Jon Pearlstone, February 10, 2008
    Reggie

    Here is an "insider" into the HB industry -- he makes very compelling arguments and has been quite accurate with the ups and downs of the HB's

    Take a look and let me know what you think -- See his entries and the comments for his blog from this weekend (altho-ugh all his entries are very interesting)-I asked him for more specifics on how he sees the market rebounding and he replied with a quite detailed numerical analysis -- would love to hear your feedback.

    http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewBlog.aspx?t=01000603789045326844
    62
    ...
    written by Reggie Middleton, February 11, 2008
    I am quite familiar with Florida homebuilder. He is actually the guest blogger on this site for the CFO series. I haven't read his stuff lately though. In general I agree with him on most points. The only point where we really diverge is whether we are going into a recession and how long. I am quite bearish in this regard, and he (at least as of the last time I read his writings) is not quite as bearish.

    I will get over to read his recent stuff soon.
    67
    Lennar update
    written by Arun Raja, February 11, 2008

    I can't seem to download the Lennar update. Says it hasn't been published yet.

    FL builder seems to assume this will be a mild recession with recovery by 4Q08 and therefore stocks should go up 2Q08. Given that housing tends to lead recovery by around 3 months lead time, it does seem a premature call to me. http://calculatedrisk.blogspot...overy.html
    62
    ...
    written by Reggie Middleton, February 11, 2008
    I've fixed the download. Floridabuilder and I were always slightly distanced on our view of the economy. As you know, I'm a bit more bearish. I see the housing slump lasting into 2010 - alas, I can be wrong.
    208
    can you clarify your cost of sales projections?
    written by Nathan Lewis, February 12, 2008
    Hi Reggie,

    I've been chewing through your Lennar and Ryland stuff, and I have a question about your cost of sales estimates. You have Lennar's unit cost of sales, excluding impairment, growing at 4.4% in 2008 and 3.0% in 2009. It's this COGS rise, combined with the falling selling prices (-4.1% in 2008 and -4.7% in 2009) that produces the margin deterioration and negative cashflow for the company going forward. However, I would assume that the big writedowns in inventory must also cut cost of sales going forward, no? If so, their margins would be considerably better from here on out I would imagine. Let me know what I'm missing here.
    62
    I don't follow your logic
    written by Reggie Middleton, February 12, 2008
    Cost of sales are not correlated with asset impairments. The impairments came from devaluation of assets held on the books. The primary driver in the cost of sales are sales incentives and the ratio of resources needed to generate the sales to actual revenue. If anything, the higher the impairment charge, the more the company would have to incentivize(?) to create a unit sale, thus generally a higher cost of sale per unit (ex. closing cost costs subsidy, free amenities, free cars, flat screens, furniture, commission rebates, etc.)

    Am I missing something in your interpretation here?
    0
    ...
    written by flow5, February 15, 2008
    The Fed, though intended to be an ?independent? agency has, like the Supreme Court, ?followed the elections?.

    We don't have captialism, we have regulated capitalism.

    We have an ?elastic? currency ?aided and abetted? by ?elastic? legislators. We have perennial Walter Wriston caricatures pressuring the House Committee on Financial Services & the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. We have a conspiratorial organization that goes by the name of the American Bankers Association - with its well funded lobbyists.

    The Board of Governors is self-described as: ?subject to oversight by Congress, which periodically reviews its activities and can alter its responsibilities by statute? Even so, the Fed is ?connected at the hip? with Congressional allies, a la Greenspan, who the New York Times called a ?three-card maestro?.

    The Fed?s research is politically coordinated, targeted to justify its monetary policy objectives - those that appease the banking community. It?s as the university professor said: ?innovate away from home?. Academic freedom has become the ?barbarous relic?.

    The great German poet and playwright Bertolt Brecht would have agreed and once said it was "easier to rob by setting up a bank than by holding up (one)."

    The profit proclivities of the American banker are responsible for our speculative orgy.

    Write comment

    security code
    Write the displayed characters


    busy

    Last Updated ( Thursday, 08 January 2009 )
     
    < Prev   Next >

    Reggie's RSS
    feed image

    Reggie Middleton has 3,000 subscribers, worldwide!

    Click on the slide!

    Protestant Episcopal Cathedral Foundation

    The Protestant Episcopal Cathedral Foundation subscribes to Reggie Middletonhh

    More...
    Click on the slide!

    BoomBustBloggin' @BuddhaKahn

    Another BoomBustBlog event. This one at BuddhaKahn, NYC.

    More...
    Click on the slide!

    Morgan Stanley subscribes to Reggie Middleton

    Morgan Stanley subscribes to Reggie Middleton

    More...
    Click on the slide!

    Arriving @79th Street Boat Basin, via the Hudson River, on the MotherLand

    Arriving @79th Street Boat Basin, via the Hudson River, on the MotherLand

    More...
    Click on the slide!

    This is BoomBustBloggin'

    The water through the Palisades felt warmer than the air - 77 degrees

    Whoa!!! This water feels good!!!

    More...
    Click on the slide!

    The Hartford Subscribes to Reggie's Research

    The Hartford Subscribes to Reggie's Research

    More...
    Click on the slide!

    Bank of America Subscribes to Reggie Middleton

    Bank of America Subscribes to Reggie Middleton

    More...
    Click on the slide!

    The guys who came on the trip had a good time

    Life is Good!

    I'm hopeful that all who came along for the networking and fun event had a good time. My goal was…

    More...
    Click on the slide!

    The IMF subscribes to Reggie Middleton

    The IMF listens to subscribes to Reggie

    More...
    Click on the slide!

    Deutsche Bank Subscribes to Reggie Middleton

    Deutsche Bank Subscribes to Reggie Middleton

    More...
    Click on the slide!

    Fore Research subscribes to Reggie Middleton

    Fore Research subscribes to Reggie Middleton

    More...
    Click on the slide!

    BoomBustBloggin' on the Motherland on the Hudson

    BoomBustBloggin' on the Motherland on the Hudson

    More...
    Click on the slide!

    BoomBustBloggin' @ 79th St Boat Basin, NYC

    Bloggin at the Boat Basin, via the Motherland.

    More...
    Click on the slide!

    Deloitte Subscribes to Reggie Middleton

    Deloitte Subscribes to Reggie Middleton

    More...
    Click on the slide!

    The NY Daily News Subscribes to Reggie Middleton

    The NY Daily News Subscribes to Reggie Middleton

    More...
    Click on the slide!

    Reggie vs the Hedge Funds

    Reggie vs the Hegde Funds

    More...
    Click on the slide!

    JP Morgan Subscribes to Reggie Middleton

    JP Morgan Subscribes to Reggie Middleton

    More...
    Click on the slide!

    Desjardins subscribes to Reggie Middleton

    Desjardins subscribes to Reggie Middleton

    More...
    Click on the slide!

    BNP Paribas subscribes to Reggie Middleton

    BNP Paribas subscribes to Reggie Middleton

    More...
    Click on the slide!

    BoomBustBlog Boat Trip!

    On the Bow of the MotherLand - the BoomBustBlog Boat Trip

    This is the BoomBustBlogger crew on the Bow of the MotherLand on the way up the Hudson River.

    Click on the slide!

    My Investment Style

    My Investment Style!

    More...
    Frontpage Slideshow (version 2.0.0) - Copyright © 2006-2008 by JoomlaWorks

    Visit Reggie @: