Newsletter
There is no list available.
Click here to unregister
CB Workflows
Main Menu
Front Page
Sitemap
Register
Awards
All articles
Praise
Blog Roll
Links/Blog roll
Survery
Contact Me
Book Club
Search the Blog
Invite Others
Who is Reggie?
Archives
Downloads
Performance
Topics
Popular Posts
Reggie's research

Wednesday, 12 December 2007 | Reggie Middleton

I have decided to keep pumping as much of my preliminary research as possible to the blog for free. Please read and accept the disclaimer below. In addition to the disclaimer, I want to add that this...
+ Full Story

The next GGP??? A timely actionable note

Friday, 14 November 2008 | Reggie Middleton

The hard core fundamental anlalysis of this blog has been paying off in spades for many subscribers - creating real wealth, preseving significant wealth, and actually creating bonuses for Wall...
+ Full Story

More good stuff...
Links

More ...

Latest Enties
RSS
FT Alphaville
Calculated Risk
Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Nouriel Roubini's Global EconoMonitor
Front Page arrow Awards

Monoline and Mortgage Insurer Update, and My Opinions

PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 
Written by Reggie Middleton   
Tuesday, 22 January 2008

Hat tip to TradingBR:

Rating Action: Channel Reinsurance Ltd.

Moody's puts Channel Re and Two Rock on review for downgrade

New York, January 23, 2008 -- Moody's Investors Service announced today that it has placed the Aaa insurance financial strength rating of Channel Reinsurance Ltd. (Channel Re) on review for downgrade. At the same time, Moody's also placed on review for downgrade the Aa3 rating assigned to contingent capital securities issued by Two Rock Pass Through Trust, a related financing trust.

Channel Re is a financial guaranty reinsurance company dedicated to providing reinsurance capacity to MBIA Insurance Corporation (MBIA), the New York based financial guaranty insurance company. Channel Re has reinsured a broad range of risks from MBIA, including recent vintage second-lien mortgage securitizations, as well as significant amounts of ABS CDOs containing such exposures.

Moody's stated that today's rating actions were motivated by growing concern about the possible effect of these mortgage-related risks on Channel Re's credit profile in light of the prospect for worsening performance in the mortgage market and the inherent volatility in RMBS and ABS CDO exposures.

"As part of its review, Moody's will evaluate the possible impact of this exposure on Channel Re's risk-adjusted capital adequacy and franchise value", said Ranjini Venkatesan, a Moody's analyst. "We will also assess possible changes in the value that Channel Re provides to MBIA as a result of both companies' evolving credit and franchise profiles in the rapidly changing financial guaranty markets."

Moody's additionally noted that Channel Re's credit profile also has implications for the credit profile of MBIA, with strain at Channel Re placing incremental pressure on MBIA's capital adequacy, and will be a consideration in the ongoing review of MBIA's ratings. MBIA's ratings were placed on review for downgrade on January 17, 2008.

Now, the owner's of Channel Re, Rennaisance Re and Partner Re have already marked their investments in Channel Re down to near zero (see my take ). Again, Moody's is way behind the curve, being much more reactive and not very predictive. More importantly, Channel Re was formed exclusively to reinsure MBIA, forcing an extreme amount of concentration and correlation risk. MBIA also owne 17% of Channel Re, and is also on negative ratings watch. Given the outlook of the owners of Channel Re, a downgrade should be inevitable, but who knows when dealing with the big three. If a downgrade were to occur, it should immediately undercapitalize MBIA, and will compound the problems that would occure if they themselves get downgraded.

 

Today's rating actions are as follows:

 

Channel Reinsurance Ltd.

Current Rating: Aaa, on review for downgrade

Prior Rating: Aaa

 

Contingent Capital Securities issued by Two Rock Pass Through Trust

Current Rating: Aa3, on review for downgrade

Prior Rating: Aa3

 ___________________

In addition:

MGIC Provides Investor Update
MILWAUKEE (January 22, 2008) — MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE:MTG) announced today that year-end 2007 delinquency inventory was 107,120 loans, an increase of approximately 16,000 loans from the end of the third quarter. Cure rates have continued to deteriorate, resulting in a higher percentage of delinquent loans that become claims, and average claim size has also continued to increase. As a result, the Company expects incurred losses for the fourth quarter of 2007 to approximate $1.3 billion. The Company said its insurance in force at year-end 2007 was $211.7 billion.
The Company also said it is increasing its paid loss forecast for 2008 to $1.8 — $2.0 billion.
During the fourth quarter, the Company made a decision to stop writing the portion of its bulk business that insures loans which are included in Wall Street securitizations. The Company is analyzing the accounting implications of that decision on its fourth quarter results.
The Company is issuing this press release to provide current information to all investors in advance of its February 13, 2008 earnings call. The Company is not undertaking any obligation to update any information in this press release regarding the Company’s expectations or any forward-looking statements. No investor should rely on the fact that such information is current at any time other than the time at which this press release was issued.
The failure of the pure mortgage insurers to pay claims will fall directly on the GSEs such as Fannie Mae and Ginnie Mae, who buy high LTV loans that are insured by PMI and MGIC. If this occurs, and draws down the capital of this nation's backstop for mortgage financing, the housing mess we see now will seem like Disney Land compared to what may lie ahead.


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! JoomlaVote! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Yahoo! Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Trackback(0)
Comments (12)Add Comment
62
Insurers subpeonaed, again
written by Reggie Middleton, January 23, 2008
The Massachusetts's DA issued subpoenas to Ambac and MBIA requesting info on mortgage product risk disclosure.
545
...
written by fernando oliveira, January 23, 2008
its all over man. I covered my short and changed my mind for the time being. MBIA aint going to fail. thats like saying Citi will fail. the authorities wont allow it, ackman was right all along but the authorities wont allow a failure of this size I dont think.right now the banks are meeting in the ny with dinnalo and co. the stocks surged on the news. some kind of bailout will be made. what the common shareholders will get nobody knows but just the fact that I had no idea makes me cover. you will hold this through?
160
Not so fast Reggie
written by M M, January 23, 2008
It's so obvious, it's not.
387
Bailout exposure?
written by Jon Pearlstone, January 23, 2008
Reggie

what kind of funding will Ambac and Mbia need from this reported bailout? Is it practical?

Can you envision any bailout that keeps shareholder's value? This is a huge issue because the entire stock market pretty much depends right now on them being able to effectively bail the mono's out. I actually believe they will come up with something that they can hype and get the market to rally behind--I figured you would be the best source to ask if, based upon your extensive knowledge, think they can successfully do this.

I mean enough capital to buy back the AAA rating for Ambac is clearly not enough funding to make the monos work for the long term -- I would think they are opening pandora's box??

Or perhaps it will it be another MBIA-Warburg, AMBAC-AGO reinsurance head fake that really accomplishes nothing.

What do you think?

thanks
545
...
written by fernando oliveira, January 23, 2008
I would not rule out a debt issuence guaranteed by the Treasury to infuse capital on this companies. the northern rock bailout is happening that way so its possible
545
...
written by fernando oliveira, January 24, 2008
Just like a said, there was a risk of dumb money stepping in and hurting the shorts. looks like ambac will be sold
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/...rticle.do
MBIA has not put itself for sale since they had a easier time to raise money but when the problems get worse they might very well be bought
74
...
written by David LeBlanc, January 26, 2008
Reggie. First, thanks for all of the great analysis and commentary. I agree that some sort of bailout could happen (and probably will) but I am disgusted by the moral hazard created in any circumstance where the current stakeholders (debt and equity) are not completely flushed. Does this mean that once you become large enough and engage in activities risky enough to endanger the financial system, you become a protected species? Comments, am I missing anything here?
170
MBIA Insurance Corp, not MBIA Inc, will be saved
written by Dan Amoss, January 26, 2008
Reggie,

Thanks for starting this great blog.

The media is not distinguishing between the publicly traded holding company, MBIA Inc, and its insurance subsidiary, MBIA Insurance Corp. The NY Insurance Dept and Dinallo are responsible for saving what's left of MBIA Insurance's claims paying resources. This means Dinallo must do what he can to stop the insurance subsidiary from upstreaming cash to the publicly traded parent, MBI. See Ackman's latest presentation, from 11-28-07, for detail (it's near the end):

http://pershingsquare.valueinvestingcongress.com/

Also, see Ackman's comments to WSJ from Friday, Jan 25:

?Bill Ackman, head of Pershing Square Capital Management LP, a New York hedge fund that has been betting heavily for the past five years against bond insurers, reckoned that a bailout could hurt shareholders in the holding companies that own these insurers. That is because a bailout could be structured so the insurers -- which are frequently structured as subsidiaries -- stop paying dividends to the publicly traded holding companies.

??I think it?s good that there?s a proactive insurance department that?s working to protect policyholders,? says Mr. Ackman. ?That said, a word to holding-company shareholders and bondholders: caveat emptor.??

Reggie -- any thoughts on the insurance subsidiary/puclicly trade parent conflict?

Isn't there a good chance of MBI going to $0 in months, while the insurance sub (and policyholders) get at least a partial bailout (to avoid financial Armageddon for now)?

Cheers,

-SSR
545
...
written by fernando oliveira, January 26, 2008
mbia could easy get bought out 'it doesnt make any economic sense' is not an argument against it. whitman and warburg pincus threw money at them and other people could very well do as well, this would render bankrupcty puts worthless and send the stock soaring as the shorts cover
62
...
written by Reggie Middleton, January 28, 2008
Whitman and Warburg pincus threw money at the holding company, as Ackman has alledged. There is significant risk in investing in the holding company when the insurance dept has the authority to cut funds off from the holding company. If I were to buy out Ambac or MBIA, I would buy the subsidiaries with parental guarantees and cede additional risk. The issue is, I just wouldn't buy them.

Investors are trying to bottom fish, and that is a very dangerous game from a risk reward perspective. The minimal reward (the muni field is crowded with big competition, the structured finance field is dead) is not worth the big risks.

If the state were to organize a bailout, they will bail out the insurer to protect the interests of their constituency, not the holding company. They are not bailing out investors. As a matter of fact, if I were the insurance commissionner, I would withhold all payments to the parent company and direct all capital to claims surplus. If and when that breaks the holdign company, I would step in with outside funds for the insurance subsidiary. That means that the debt and equity investors would have to lose their last dime before the first penny of bailout money enters the picture.
545
...
written by fernando oliveira, January 28, 2008
Regarding the bailout, I do agree that its likely shareholders could lose their shirts. however if the banks do agree on the bailout plan ($15b lines of credit to mbia and ambac) this would count as claims paying resources and it guaranteed the triple A and this wouldn't hurt the shareholders, it would be madness for the banks to do that and i dont think they will but there is a risk for shorts. plus after so much investement and privaty equity its very possible this companies will be buyout, whether it will be the holding company or the subsidiary who knows, but I dont think its a slam dunk shorting can make money at this point
62
...
written by Reggie Middleton, January 28, 2008
I've been tracing these companies down from the mid 60's to low 70's. The slam dunk has been made already for most who have really been following the sector astutely. There is always more risk towards the end of a trade. I am not giving my opinion as a trade, just on the fundamentals of the actual companies.

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy

Last Updated ( Thursday, 20 November 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >
Related Items
Visit Reggie @:
BoomBustBog Mailbox

You are not logged in.

Who's Online?