|
|
|
||
Lennar gets a haircut, a shave, and a mustache trim |
PoorBest
| Written by Reggie Middleton | |
| Thursday, 06 December 2007 | |
|
So many things to blog about lately. The current environment is fraught with risk and opportunity, it appears they are two sides of the same coin. Hat tip to Arun, who pointed out that Lennar has sold much more property in their "fire sale". I would like to note that, at least for the time being, these transactions should not be considered fire sales, but normal economic activity considering the macro environment.
The first deal is not very descriptive, so trying to put numbers on it would be pure speculation. The second deal, we can at least guess where it puts Lennar - both of these deals are in areas that have been hard hit in the downturn. What is more important, IMO, is not so much how much land they have sold, but what the actual economic book value of their inventory is, and if it is in excess of their liabilities. Let's take a conservative stab at it, but before we do - let's speculate. Using the numbers in the article, the Seaport hotel was a $129 million development (hard to put a figure on the retail and commercial since I don't know the area and am too lazy to look it up), just by running a simplistic per unit breakdown on the dollar size of the project given. Applying the 50% haircut that Morgan Stanley gave, that would approximate (or speculate) that Lennar raised about $65 million (plus some value for the commercial portion of the mixed use that even I wouldn't hazard a wild guess) in that sale. Using the same off the cuff calculation for the Tampa sale, Lennar raised about $453 million. Now, I know (and you should accept) that these are probably some fairly rough and inaccurate numbers, but I am trying to guesstimate what their current debt to enterprise value is. Applying the rough 50% valuation haircut that I came up with in the last post, Lennar has impaired its assets by an additional $518 million dollars (remember the MS deal). This means to me that, for valuation purposes, we should be subtracting about an additional billion dollars from Lennar's book value. A simpler way to look at it is to halve the value that you see as inventory on Lennar's balance sheet, and substitute cash in for inventory where they made a sale. It is overly simplistic, but it does give you a guideline. Lennar should now have cash to solidly service debt for a year. The caveat is, any smart lender should realize that the collateral ain't getting any more valuable and is not going to stop depreciating any time soon either. I would snatch my credit back, if I were them. Using the new valuation levels, I am sure Lennar is now tripping their net worth covenants considering how much debt they are carrying off balance sheet (at least a billion, full recourse) - in other words, they are effectively balance sheet insolvent. I am not confident that the lenders calculate Lennar's debt to asset ratio accurately, though. Many seem to have missed the off balance sheet stuff. I guess that's why Lennar put it off balance sheet, duh! As far as the insolvency goes, we will know for sure when they file their 8k. I know my shorts aren't going anywhere. The funny thing is that Lennar, and the entire homebuilding sector, shot up in price about 3% yesterday. Remember Enron!!! The macro environment is horrible and getting worse for these companies. The development in the monoline industry that I have been crowing about for a couple of months now threatens to virtually shut down the mortgage industry for the time being. If you think it was hard to get a loan before... In about a week I will start revealing my short positions in the commercial real estate industry, and boy is it a eye opener. I will create a members only portion of the blog to allow real time access to my research, so the subscribing members do not have to wait. I should have that done by the end of next week. For those who don't normally follow my blog, here is the Lennar backgrounder, which I feel is quite useful for any who have an economic interest in this company or any homebuilder.
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Hits: 933 Trackback(0)
Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
|
|
| Last Updated ( Thursday, 08 January 2009 ) |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Reggie Middleton has 3,000 subscribers, worldwide!
Visit Reggie @:
Who's Online?
| 3002 registered |
| 0 today |
| 5 yesterday |
| 27 this week |
| 37 this month |
| • Boosun | 0 |
| • Pulkit | 0 |
| • Kenshin.kudo | 0 |
| • VoidStar | 0 |
| • Kevpal | 0 |
Latest Comments
| Insulet Corporation ... |
| The Forensic Analysi... |
| Super Tankers, Super... |
| Amid the rally, I lo... |
| Amid the rally, I lo... |
| Amid the rally, I lo... |
| Amid the rally, I lo... |
MyWebSite
Latest Subscription Content
Radio Broadcaster Snapshot (149)
(Research Reports)
Socio-economic stratification model (285)
(Research Reports)
Hartford Insurance Group Forensic Analysis - Pro (133)
(Research Reports)
Hartford Insurance Group spreads and counterparty/debt holders - pro (150)
(Research Reports)
10/25/08 Insurance Industry Update - Professional w/inventory addendum (102)
(Research Reports)
10/25/08 Insurance Industry Update - retail (244)
(Research Reports)
Blog vs. Broker Analysis - supplementary material (77)
(Research Reports)
HIG Actionable Item (83)
(Research Reports)
Hartford Insurance Actionable Opinion Note (231)
(Research Reports)
Goldman Sachs Report June 21, 2008 (200)
(Research Reports)
I strongly recommend new users browse through my recent archives. There is a wealth of information here. Older archives are available through the "All Articles" link in the main menu.
















