Newsletter
There is no list available.
Click here to unregister
CB Workflows
Main Menu
Front Page
Sitemap
Register
Awards
All articles
Praise
Blog Roll
Links/Blog roll
Survery
Contact Me
Book Club
Search the Blog
Invite Others
Who is Reggie?
Archives
Downloads
Performance
Topics
Popular Posts
Reggie's research

Wednesday, 12 December 2007 | Reggie Middleton

I have decided to keep pumping as much of my preliminary research as possible to the blog for free. Please read and accept the disclaimer below. In addition to the disclaimer, I want to add that this...
+ Full Story

The next GGP??? A timely actionable note

Friday, 14 November 2008 | Reggie Middleton

The hard core fundamental anlalysis of this blog has been paying off in spades for many subscribers - creating real wealth, preseving significant wealth, and actually creating bonuses for Wall...
+ Full Story

More good stuff...
Links

More ...

Latest Enties
RSS
FT Alphaville
Calculated Risk
Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Nouriel Roubini's Global EconoMonitor
Front Page arrow tagsarrow Commercial Banks

Reggie Middleton's Boom Bust Blog

A digital diary of my global economic outlook combined with a focus on fundamental and forensic analysis

Tag >> Commercial Banks

ResearchMortgage BankingLegislation, Law & the GovernmentInvestment BanksHeard on the StreetGlobal MacroFinancial ShenanigansCurrent AffairsCommercial BanksCapital MarketsBanking 21 Nov 2008 12:00 AM
Reggie Middleton
I told you so, from Doo Doo to TARP and back to Doo Doo by Reggie Middleton Comment (0)

First, read the "Doo Doo 32" post, then the "Anatomy of a Sick Bank", then reference the TARP list (corporate welfare) below (source:US Treasury Emergency Economic DEstabilization Act). Ya' see anybody familiar??? It's almost like having a crystal ball - filled with doo doo! I actually believe this particular move was necessary on behalf of the Treasury, and was what I recommended when Paulson originally released his 3 page tome of economic domination (see WARNING: the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 may significantly DESTABILIZE the economy!, Shock & Awe: redux and Reggie Middleton asks, "Do you guys know who you're messin' with?"). After reading Doo Doo 32 and the Sick Bank articles, no one can honestly say that they didn't know who was to end up on this list.

 

Date Seller Transaction Type Description Price Paid Pricing Mechanism    
Name of Institution City State          
10/28/2008 Bank of America Corporation Charlotte NC Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $15,000,000,000 Par
10/28/2008 Bank of New York Mellon Corporation New York NY Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $3,000,000,000 Par
10/28/2008 Citigroup Inc. New York NY Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $25,000,000,000 Par
10/28/2008 The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. New York NY Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $10,000,000,000 Par
10/28/2008 JPMorgan Chase & Co. New York NY Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $25,000,000,000 Par
10/28/2008 Morgan Stanley New York NY Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $10,000,000,000 Par
10/28/2008 State Street Corporation Boston MA Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $2,000,000,000 Par
10/28/2008 Wells Fargo & Company San Francisco CA Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $25,000,000,000 Par
10/28/2008 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. New York NY Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $10,000,000,000 Par
11/14/2008 Bank of Commerce Holdings Redding CA Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $17,000,000 Par
11/14/2008 1st FS Corporation Hendersonville NC Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $16,369,000 Par
11/14/2008 UCBH Holdings, Inc. San Francisco CA Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $298,737,000 Par
11/14/2008 Northern Trust Corporation Chicago IL Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $1,576,000,000 Par
11/14/2008 SunTrust Banks, Inc. Atlanta GA Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $3,500,000,000 Par
11/14/2008 Broadway Financial Corporation Los Angeles CA Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $9,000,000 Par
11/14/2008 Washington Federal Inc. Seattle WA Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $200,000,000 Par
11/14/2008 BB&T Corp. Winston-Salem NC Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $3,133,640,000 Par
11/14/2008 Provident Bancshares Corp. Baltimore MD Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $151,500,000 Par
11/14/2008 Umpqua Holdings Corp. Portland OR Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $214,181,000 Par
11/14/2008 Comerica Inc. Dallas TX Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $2,250,000,000 Par
11/14/2008 Regions Financial Corp. Birmingham AL Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $3,500,000,000 Par
11/14/2008 Capital One Financial Corporation McLean VA Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $3,555,199,000 Par
11/14/2008 First Horizon National Corporation Memphis TN Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $866,540,000 Par
11/14/2008 Huntington Bancshares Columbus OH Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $1,398,071,000 Par
11/14/2008 KeyCorp Cleveland OH Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $2,500,000,000 Par
11/14/2008 Valley National Bancorp Wayne NJ Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $300,000,000 Par
11/14/2008 Zions Bancorporation Salt Lake City UT Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $1,400,000,000 Par
11/14/2008 Marshall & Ilsley Corporation Milwaukee WI Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $1,715,000,000 Par
11/14/2008 U.S. Bancorp Minneapolis MN Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $6,599,000,000 Par
11/14/2008 TCF Financial Corporation Wayzata MN Purchase Preferred Stock w/Warrants $361,172,000 Par

 

ResearchConsumer FinanceCommercial BanksBanking 11 Nov 2008 12:00 AM
Reggie Middleton
Another contrarian name brand trade bears fruit by Reggie Middleton Comment (25)

When I first introduced my American Express research in June, I expected (and was not disappointed) many to tug the name brand line in saying that Amex was the cream of the crop, they deal only with high end consumers, large business accounts, yada yada yada. Name brand marketing, it seems, fools many investors.

If one were to peruse the reseach in the Amex link above, you will see where practically each and every admonition has come to fruitition. Hopefully, this in combination with the events of the recent past should convince readers that hard core fundamental and forensic research trumps name branding every time - all the time. As with my Goldman Sachs research, Morgan Stanley research, and many other name brands, I was (to my knowledge) the only one bearish on these companies at the beginning of this year where the share prices were still high enough to profitably short or get out of (if you have a "long only" mandate).

From Bloomberg:

American Express Co. won Federal Reserve approval to convert to a commercial bank, gaining access to funds as credit losses build and sales of asset-backed bonds plummet.

The Fed waived a 30-day waiting period on the application ``in light of the unusual and exigent circumstances affecting the financial markets,'' according to a statement released today in Washington. Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and his colleagues unanimously voted for the action.

Credit-card holders failed to repay loans in the third quarter at almost twice the rate of a year earlier, New York- based American Express said last month. With defaults rising along with the unemployment rate, October marked the first month since 1993 that card companies were unable to sell bonds backed by customer payments.

``That business has totally dried up,'' said Frederic Dickson, who helps oversee about $20 billion as chief market strategist at D.A. Davidson & Co. in Lake Oswego, Oregon. ``If I were a shareholder, it wouldn't send a very warm and fuzzy message to me,'' he said today in a phone interview.

American Express, the largest U.S. credit-card company by purchases, joins former investment banks Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley, which were allowed by the Fed in September to become commercial banks.

 

 

StrategyResearchCommercial Banks 10 Nov 2008 12:00 AM
Reggie Middleton
The name brand contrarian plays have bore sweet fruit by Reggie Middleton Comment (13)

For those who were doubtful of my research and stated positions in the big name brand banks, I think a recap is in order. I have taken strong bearish positions on a few of the most revered name brands, to the dismay of people who should really know better than to doubt my investment acument. Before we get to the performance of my contrarian name brand play, let's peruse a recent Bloomberg article extract:

Fed Defies Transparency Aim in Refusal to Identify Bank Loans  

Nov. 10 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve is refusing to identify the recipients of almost $2 trillion of emergency loans from American taxpayers or the troubled assets the central bank is accepting as collateral.

Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said in September they would comply with congressional demands for transparency in a $700 billion bailout of the banking system. Two months later, as the Fed lends far more than that in separate rescue programs that didn't require approval by Congress, Americans have no idea where their money is going or what securities the banks are pledging in return.

``The collateral is not being adequately disclosed, and that's a big problem,'' said Dan Fuss, vice chairman of Boston- based Loomis Sayles & Co., where he co-manages $17 billion in bonds. ``In a liquid market, this wouldn't matter, but we're not. The market is very nervous and very thin.''

Bloomberg News has requested details of the Fed lending under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act and filed a federal lawsuit Nov. 7 seeking to force disclosure.

The Fed made the loans under terms of 11 programs, eight of them created in the past 15 months, in the midst of the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression.

 I can give you a few guesses where that money probably went. Just peruse the performance post and mark the commercial and investment bank names on the list, starting with the  Riskiest Bank on the Street and the Golden Boys mentioned below, then work your way down to The Anatomy of a Sick Bank!. I am sure some of those big name brands are in a lot more trouble than they let on.

Now, on to how my contrarian name brand plays have been doing...

Goldman Sachs with the name brand conscious (yet financially unconscious) investors saying they are too well connected to fall, smarter than the rest, best name brand on the street, blah blah, blahhh. For non-subscribers, here is a dated Goldman analysis available for free download  pdf professional_gs_report_sample 350.12 Kb. Of course, 6 or 7 months later the sell side banks are dropping estimates on Goldman and Morgan, but you heard it in the beginning of the year from me. GS is currently in the mid 70's, down from one hudred and eighty dollars when the first report came out.

From Bloomberg... Goldman, Morgan Stanley Earnings Estimates Reduced by JPMorgan Nov ... ... before converting to bank holding companies in September, had their fourth-quarter and 2009 earnings estimates cut by JPMorgan Chase & Co. Goldman may lose 58 ...
From Reggie Middleton...
Here is my detailed opinion on Goldman Sachs. Be sure to review my precursor to this report: Goldman Sachs Snapshot: Risk vs. Reward vs. Reputations on the Street. Anybody who is interested in how I
Wednesday, 23 July 2008

... Fed keeps banks afloat as money market crisis deepens - what banks do you think they are referring to??? Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. The run on the prime brokerage accounts of Morgan Stanley h...
Thursday, 25 September 2008

 



Read more...


UK and EurozoneLegislation, Law & the GovernmentGlobal MacroFinancial ShenanigansCurrent AffairsConsumer FinanceCommercial BanksCapital MarketsBanking 3 Nov 2008 12:00 AM
Reggie Middleton
Corporate welfare by Reggie Middleton Comment (7)

I was very clear in warning about the "everyman for himself" phenomenon back when the first US bailout package was announced in the US. All of the money given banks are going straight to the bank's coffers and nowhere else. It is a farce  to believe that banks will act against their own self interest when given money. PNC took the money and bought a bank with a risky loan portfolio to boost deposits, AIG is paying margin calls with its taxpayer money, JP Morgan and Merrill chiefs flat out said, "No, I will not lend the new money out", and the Euro banks are also designing special textual diagrams to display their views on handling the new low interest rates they are benifititing from by way of the UK government. See what I just pulled off of the memorandum of understanding between HSBC and the government: