We
expected Navistar’s unit pricing in the truck segment to increase 42%
y-o-y but due to higher than expected contribution from military segment and
launch of new products like ProStar resulted in a 55% y-o-y increase in unit
price of truck. (Excluding the price impact there was a 1% variation in
reported and actual revenues). On the volume front, we expected
Navistar’s truck shipments to increase 5% y-o-y while we expected engine
shipments to decrease 24%. In line with our expectations, Navistar’s
truck shipments increased 10% (~ due to higher than expected contribution from
military) and engine shipments decreased 27%.
Navistar’s net sales increased 34%
to $4.0 bn in 3Q2008 as against $3.0 bn in 3Q2007. However it is interesting to
note that Navistar’s sales excl U.S. military sales declined 4%. We
will look forward to Navistar’s conference call today to gauge the
sustainability of revenues from military segment going forward. We shall
update the financial model in light of 3Q2008 results and company’s
conference call.
120
1024x768
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:roman;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 159 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:swiss;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1073750139 0 0 159 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:10.0pt;
margin-left:0in;
line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-default-props:yes;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
.MsoPapDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
margin-bottom:10.0pt;
line-height:115%;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;
mso-header-margin:.5in;
mso-footer-margin:.5in;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
--
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0in;
mso-para-margin-right:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0in;
line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
|
VARIANCE ANALYSIS |
3Q-2007 |
3Q-2008 |
Change |
Variance analysis |
|||||||
|
Actual |
Estimates |
% |
Absolute |
||||||||
|
Sales and revenues |
|||||||||||
|
Sales of manufactured products, |
2,852 |
3,879 |
3,536 |
10% |
343 |
||||||
|
Finance revenues |
104 |
75 |
94 |
-20% |
(19) |
||||||
|
Sales and revenues, net |
2,956 |
|
3,954 |
3,629 |
9% |
325 |
|||||
|
- |
|||||||||||
|
Costs of products sold |
2,428 |
3,115 |
2,968 |
5% |
147 |
||||||
|
Selling, general and |
368 |
386 |
380 |
2% |
6 |
||||||
|
Engineering and product |
86 |
108 |
102 |
6% |
6 |
||||||
|
Interest expense |
125 |
88 |
102 |
-13% |
|
||||||
|
Other (income) expenses, net |
(34) |
(5) |
- |
(5) |
|||||||
|
Total costs and expenses |
2,973 |
|
3,692 |
3,551 |
4% |
141 |
|||||
|
Equity in income of |
22 |
18 |
20 |
-9% |
(2) |
||||||
|
Income (loss) before income tax |
5 |
280 |
98 |
187% |
182 |
||||||
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
(9) |
(8) |
(29) |
-73% |
21 |
||||||
|
Net income (loss) |
(4) |
|
272 |
68 |
298% |
204 |
|||||
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
(0.05) |
3.85 |
0.97 |
296% |
2.88 |
||||||
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
(0.05) |
3.68 |
0.93 |
294% |
2.75 |
||||||
|
Growth (y-o-y) |
0% |
||||||||||
|
Sales and revenues |
U.S. military sales |
||||||||||
|
Sales of manufactured products, |
-20% |
36% |
24% |
12% |
|||||||
|
Finance revenues |
24% |
-28% |
-10% |
-18% |
|||||||
|
Sales and revenues, net |
-19% |
|
34% |
23% |
|
11% |
|||||
|
Revenue growth |
|||||||||||
|
Truck |
70% |
49% |
21.6% |
Navistar's revenues |
|||||||
|
Engine |
-17% |
-23% |
5.8% |
||||||||
|
Parts |
10% |
3% |
6.6% |
||||||||
|
Financial service |
-29% |
-14% |
-14.9% |
||||||||
|
Sales and revenues, net |
-19% |
|
34% |
23% |
|
11% |
|||||
|
Pricing growth |
|||||||||||
|
Truck (q-o-q) |
3.9% |
8.3% |
-1.0% |
9.3% |
Navistar's unit price |
||||||
|
Engine (q-o-q) |
10.1% |
11.3% |
-0.8% |
12.1% |
|||||||
|
Truck (y-o-y) |
55% |
42% |
13.4% |
||||||||
|
Engine (y-o-y) |
13.5% |
1.2% |
12.3% |
||||||||
|
Volume growth (y-o-y) |
|||||||||||
|
Navistar's |
Navistar's truck |
||||||||||
|
School buses |
-26% |
-16% |
5% |
-21% |
|||||||
|
Class 6 and 7 medium trucks |
-54% |
4% |
-6% |
9% |
|||||||
|
Class 8 trucks |
-58% |
48% |
34% |
14% |
|||||||
|
Total |
-75% |
18% |
14% |
5% |
|||||||
|
Total Expansion Markets |
-25% |
-4% |
2% |
-6% |
|||||||
|
Truck shipments |
-58% |
10% |
5% |
5% |
|||||||
|
Engine shipments |
-15% |
-27% |
-24% |
-3% |
|||||||
|
Costs of products sold |
-19% |
28% |
22% |
6% |
Navistar's total cost |
||||||
|
Selling, general and |
15% |
5% |
3% |
2% |
|||||||
|
Engineering and product |
-25% |
26% |
19% |
7% |
|||||||
|
Interest expense |
6% |
-30% |
-19% |
-11% |
|||||||
|
Total costs and expenses |
-16% |
24% |
19% |
5% |
|||||||
|
Gross margin |
17.9% |
21.2% |
18.2% |
3.0% |
|||||||
|
Operating margin |
-0.6% |
6.6% |
2.1% |
4.5% |
|||||||
|
Pre-tax margin |
0.2% |
7.1% |
2.7% |
4.4% |
|||||||
|
Net income margin |
-0.1% |
6.9% |
1.9% |
5.0% |
|||||||
|
Truck |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Revenues |
1,715 |
2,922 |
2,552 |
14% |
370 |
||||||
|
Price per unit (000's) |
69.7 |
108.2 |
98.9 |
9% |
9.3 |
||||||
|
Navistar's chargeouts in units |
|||||||||||
|
School buses |
3,200 |
2,700 |
3,375 |
-20% |
|||||||
|
Class 6 and 7 medium trucks |
5,600 |
5,800 |
5,289 |
10% |
|||||||
|
Class 8 trucks |
6,500 |
9,600 |
8,719 |
10% |
|||||||
|
Total Traditional Markets |
2,600 |
18,100 |
17,383 |
4% |
|||||||
|
Total Expansion Markets |
3,900 |
8,900 |
8,425 |
6% |
|||||||
|
Navistar's total shipments |
6,500 |
|
27,000 |
25,807 |
5% |
|
|||||
|
Engine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Revenues |
971 |
808 |
752 |
7.5% |
56 |
||||||
|
Price per unit (000's) |
8.97 |
10.19 |
9.08 |
12.2% |
1.11 |
||||||
|
Unit sales |
|||||||||||
|
Ford |
65,300 |
25,200 |
45,710 |
-45% |
|||||||
|
Other OEM |
29,200 |
4,800 |
23,360 |
-79% |
|||||||
|
Total OEM sales |
94,500 |
30,300 |
69,070 |
-56% |
|||||||
|
Intercompany sales |
13,700 |
19,000 |
13,701 |
39% |
|||||||
|
Total sales |
108,200 |
|
79,300 |
82,771 |
-4.2% |
|
|||||
|
Parts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Revenues |
405 |
444 |
451 |
-1.6% |
(7) |
||||||
|
Financial service |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Revenues |
133 |
95 |
115 |
-17.3% |
(20) |
||||||
I
have included the full variance analysis spreadsheet (yes the actual
Excel spreadsheet) along with an updated valuation number for
subscribers to download - see
Navistar Variance sheet (1.02 MB 2008-09-04 08:28:51). For those who are not subscribers, the
valuation has changed but since I don't believe that the company can
maintain a 20x upside surprise in the military shipping I still have a
bearish slant on the company. My investment horizon is 6 months to a year out, so please keep that in mind when reading my opinions.

Tweet me!

