Thursday, 21 February 2008 00:00

Nuggets of Reggie Wisdom for today's asset backed market

KEY has just written down
$100 million off of its CMBS portfolio. It is not even a top ten player
--- Wachovia is #1, Lehman has $40B of this on books, then you have BSC
and MS.

Sell side analysts are quoted: "CRE loans
held in the portfolio should not be subject to
mark-tomarket/model adjustments. The adjustments are market related,
which in turn is a liquidity phenomenon rather a credit one; however,
credit risk will increase the longer liquidity issues persist for the
industry."

I disagree. There is plenty of liquidity in the
system, and more being pumped in by the day. The inability to move the
inventory is due to, and rightly so, the fear of insolvency. The loans
were written at the top of the market at high LTVs. As the market
returns to equilibrium (a long ways off), the loan amounts will surpass
the asset values, hence the insolvency. We are in a historically low
interest rate environment with the FED still pushing money into the
system with a historically high level of players. The reason it is not
working is that you can't solve a solvency problem with a liquidity
solution. You can postpone it, but the eventual return to the mean will
just get that much worse with the inevitable advent of
inflation/stagflation. Realistically, it is a bad idea to try to
inflate your way out of insolvency.


KEY's 100mm mark was on unsold and portfolio CMBS of 1.0 B --- 10%
mark. If all of the broker dealers mark to that you might have a
serious reset of book value ---- the fact that they are technically
insolvent will be revealed.

This is my off the cuff comment without much thought.

I
am working on the next shoe to drop in and effort to get ahead of the
crowd. This real estate thing is getting too crowded and I see several
other big cracks in the financial institutions armor now that I am
taking a closer look. CMBS risk is still highly under appreciated,
through.

Last modified on Thursday, 21 February 2008 00:00

3 comments

  • Comment Link Chris Marshall Thursday, 03 April 2008 03:45 posted by Chris Marshall

    Reggie,

    Have you seen the Taubman Centers (TCO)balance sheet, the Net Tangible assets is NEGATIVE!!
    I realise that not too much debt in due in the next couple of years, but their attributable revenue is only $60 Mill, so if vacancy rates go up/ revenues down/ loan rates rise (they lost BB rating), where do they go from here???

    Report
  • Comment Link Reggie Middleton Thursday, 21 February 2008 10:52 posted by Reggie Middleton

    That's "KEY", not EY. The "K" is drop capped. I was trying to be cute ;D

    Report
  • Comment Link Peter M. Ladstaetter Thursday, 21 February 2008 10:48 posted by Peter M. Ladstaetter

    Reggie,

    what does EY stand for? Ernst & Young? Sorry for asking. Thanks

    Report
Login to post comments